they would have given the taker offsideEverybody is getting somewhat irate about this, but hands up who reckons we would have scored the penner?!
compare this with that lamppost going down on a land mine when laporte touched his nipple and still only one replay from back.
Its not even subtle .
‘Employ’ or ‘enjoy’?This is what pisses me off most, I’ve come to expect them looking for reasons not to give us a penalty, but it’s the blatant double standards they employ when officiating us, constantly giving the opposition free kicks etc but when the same’s done to us ? fuck all !
The disparity in the way the game was officiated was blatant. Both teams were NOT refereed to the same standards.You'r totally choosing to ignore the clear fouls not given, the throw one x3 and corners X3 given the wrong way. And all against us. Incompetence would mean both sides were impacted. Corruption is clear.
Got nowhere near it! Phil got to the ball knocked it forward then McCarthy hit Phil's foot knocking him over. You need to go to SpecSaversThe keeper got a very, very slight touch on the ball, so feint that even he wouldn't have felt it. It certainly wouldn't have impacted Foden's route to the goal but the contact on his foot definitely did.
Ashley Young on Aguero has to be the ultimate?On a par with the worst decision I have ever seen that tonight. Level with the David Luiz non-red at the Etihad against Chelsea a few years back.
Cannot get my head around how VAR didn’t overturn it, their excuse is utter bollocks. Moss would have blown his whistle before Foden hit the turf if he had a red shirt on.
The 'given fouls' diagrams are telling.38 attempted tackles by the Saints
View attachment 12236
4 fouls, only one in their own half, whereas all 6 of ours were in our own half
View attachment 12237
and the only foul we got after the 36th minute was the one at the bottom.
as for the penalty...
View attachment 12238
you don't say...
View attachment 12239
View attachment 12240