JRockBlues
Well-Known Member
Thought that at first but replays showed he slipped into the challenge.Am I the only one who thinks the Thiago foul on Rodri was a straight red? Two footed, reckless, out of control, taking out his standing leg...
Thought that at first but replays showed he slipped into the challenge.Am I the only one who thinks the Thiago foul on Rodri was a straight red? Two footed, reckless, out of control, taking out his standing leg...
But then you have to question him not to have the guts to stick with itTaylor’s view was that it wasn’t a foul and that’s why he let it go along with the other body to body challenges from both teams.
I just wish VAR would fuck off. You get some and you don’t get some without VAR and fans and players would accept it.
No balls have they?But they don’t have to
And that makes a difference how?Thought that at first but replays showed he slipped into the challenge.
Haaland pulled his shirt.I don't have a full understanding of the rules anymore so I was wondering, if two players are tussling for the ball, one player uses his arm and upper body strength to knock the other off balance resulting in the falling player holding the other players shirt for less than a second, what laws of the game have been breached? Who gets awarded the foul, the player that initiated the contact or the one falling over? What part of the VAR 'clear and obvious' guidelines would this decision affect? If a referee has let contact and physicality go all game where in the guidance does it say that if a goal is scored and there may have been physical contact in the build up that a referee should be instructed to view the 'incident' on the monitor with a view of disallowing a goal even though this decision is in stark contrast to the decisions he has made all game?
If there wasn’t VAR then there’s no need for this question is all I’m saying.But then you have to question him not to have the guts to stick with it