PistonBlue
Well-Known Member
It all depends on what shirt you're wearing
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Ref Watch
- Thread starter Chi-town blues
- Start date
M
M
mat
Guest
Two grounds in the PL still do not have full VAR facilities installed.So Newcastle denied a penalty, and City get a crucial goal disallowed what colour do the teams they played wear is it red?
Can you guess which ones...?
Gundogan's Moustache
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 15 Jan 2014
- Messages
- 4,439
He wasn’t wrong though it wasnt clear and obviously a foul. Also how many people just accept getting told they’re wrong and just change their mind ?If there wasn’t VAR then there’s no need for this question is all I’m saying.
How many refs have the balls to overturn VAR. I think Oliver did it once and maybe another ref once but it’s rare.
I don’t like it and never will. I jokingly said to my son that VAR will find some way of ruling it out. The whole point of football is to watch your team score a goal. It fills you with happiness and joy after a stressful week at work. VAR just finds as many ways as it can to chalk a goal off. It’s a joyless introduction to the game and forces refs to go against their gut instinct.
It wasn't a foul IN THE CONTEXT OF THE GAME (in my opinion).As much as I hate to say this, but the shirt pull is a foul. I think we would all be seriously pissed off if it had stood against us.
jimmygrimblesboots
Well-Known Member
The only way UEFA & the Premier league can stop us are the decisions their officials make , two gmaes on the trot , Copenhagen and the Dippers were goals should not have been disallowed , its a back handed compliment , we are the best team in the land and all the world and the desperation to halt us is now becoming transparent.
Haaland pulled his shirt.
Shirts are pulled at every single corner. Why aren't they classed as fouls all the time?
danielwood5
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 27 Jul 2012
- Messages
- 1,095
So I guess you're going off Law 12: Fouls and Misconduct from the 2022/23 edition of the laws of the game?Haaland pulled his shirt.
I assume you're going off the Law that states a player gives away a foul when they "hold an opponent".
As you are well aware one of the other laws in this section states that a foul is given if a player "impedes an opponent with contact", so as I asked you previously if one player "impedes an opponent with contact" i.e. pushes their arm across the upper body of an opposing player and uses their upper body strength to cause their opponent to become unbalanced, the unbalanced player then commits what could be considered a foul due to the section stating that a foul is awarded due to "holding an opponent", which player is awarded the foul? The player that initially "impeded an opposition with contact" or the player that " holds an opponent" following the initial contact?
If a referee has allowed contact and physical challenges to go on all game where in the VAR guidelines does it state that this contact goes above and beyond the "high bar" for overruling an onfield referees decision? Does this fall within the guidelines of not allowing VAR to re-referee the game?
Sheik Battle and Goal
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 31 Aug 2015
- Messages
- 1,279
It wasn’t clear and obvious.He wasn’t wrong though it wasnt clear and obviously a foul. Also how many people just accept getting told they’re wrong and just change their mind ?
Even Martin Tyler said that if VAR had watched it at full speed like Taylor did instead of slowing it down then the decision would have been different.
It is accidental. It isn't therefore wilfully reckless.And that makes a difference how?