fathellensbellend
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 30 Jul 2005
- Messages
- 4,316
So what do we do then?It is when the goal happened right after the goal kick and Liverpool didn't touch the ball again, if it's a corner that sequence never happens.
So what do we do then?It is when the goal happened right after the goal kick and Liverpool didn't touch the ball again, if it's a corner that sequence never happens.
Nothing, just wanted to point that out.So what do we do then?
After the player made contact with him..then the player made sure he was falling onto him..no way should it have been disallowedHaaland pulled his shirt.
Because VAR/TV were reffing the game.Was pissed off when Alty blew the whistle to send Klipperty off.
City were on a fast attack and he blew. He had absolutely no reason to halt the game to do that. That could have waited until the ball went out of play.
It's not a foul just by the standard he set during the game. You can't ref by one standard for 99% of the game, but then ref by a totally different standard when VAR get involved.As much as I hate to say this, but the shirt pull is a foul. I think we would all be seriously pissed off if it had stood against us.
as far back as Sterling being a millimetre offside at the Etihad, end of last seasonBut how far back do you scrutinise the game?
Yes didn’t get that decision at all. It hasn’t even warranted a mention on the football phone ins.Was pissed off when Alty blew the whistle to send Klipperty off.
City were on a fast attack and he blew. He had absolutely no reason to halt the game to do that. That could have waited until the ball went out of play.
Exactly this, football will kill itself with this, the whole point of football is scoring more goals than the other team, why bring something in that seems designed to stop goals .The whole point of football is to watch your team score a goal. It fills you with happiness and joy after a stressful week at work. VAR just finds as many ways as it can to chalk a goal off.
I think what you actually mean is "It wasn't a foul IN THE CONTEXT OF THE REST OF THE REFEREEING OF THE GAME".It wasn't a foul IN THE CONTEXT OF THE GAME (in my opinion).
You mean the 5th Official?Exactly this, football will kill itself with this, the whole point of football is scoring more goals than the other team, why bring something in that seems designed to stop goals .
All game Taylor let things go, some much worse than that, neville and tyler kept saying how "great" it was, and I agreed, and then we score, and yes there is a shirt tug in the build up, so it had to be "no goal" after a review.
It's nonsense really.