You mean like he (or his mate on the other side) did a few times for us?He should have flagged the moment Rashford sprinted towards the ball.
Haha that’s funny.Because you play to the whiste.....the risk outweighs the potential outcome.....potential goal vs freekick
AgreeObviously, but it’s interesting to see a view point from someone with such a background.
see this is where it becomes just silly in the thinking that its all a huge conspiracyso you're saying the match officials carry the rule book with them to every game ? so in the Brighton vs Liverpool game, TTA was given offside for the same thing ?
they make the rules up and when it suits united, and when they need a goal outcomes the rule book ? week after week year after year, united will always get them calls
AgreeNope you’re right we go again. Unfortunately so will PIGmol
Who let this Cornish rag in here???As always with you you just cant handle us losing....toys out of pram.
the rule is wrong...the refs interpritation or that wrong rule in this instance is correct as neither the ball is played by Rashford nor does he impede a city defender.
Take it on the chin
I meant in the media too.I didn’t mean on here. I clearly meant in/on the media. If we’d scored that goal to get back in the game I am pretty sure it would be big media news, the fact that scored it means the media will ignore it, in my humble opinion
The part where the rules imply it has to be physcailly impeding someone...which Rashford doesnt.Akanji is chasing after Rashford who has gained an advantage from starting in an offside position, which part of interference do you not get. If Ederson knew Rashford was offside and couldn't touch the ball do you not think he would of just come out and cleared it, Rashfords actions have clearly impacted on the goal.
He has been very contrary for decades, used to be on muen online and now here, I think he is a Blue though, in his own simple wayWho let this Cornish rag in here???