cheekybids
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 18 Sep 2009
- Messages
- 10,643
Honestly I’m all for transparency but you really believe it will make those who think it’s all corrupt change their minds?
The ref would have ran over to the lino and chatted to him why he thought Rashford wasn't interfering and so the goal should stand - every word of that conversation would be scrutinised to the max and there will be pages and pages about every dialogue for every controversial decision
i just can’t see it satisfying and can see more people looking into the transcripts for ‘proof’ of corruption
Still, I’m for it.
He made a decision that no one playing or watching can believe & he did it without asking for support of VAR.
Now his boss no longer wants VAR used as much so was that his motivation instead of aiming to be 100% correct.
But then the obvious decision if your motivation is to not use VAR would be to go with the liners decision.
So he’s ignored 2 opportunities to get it right for the benefit of the home team.
I actually believe if he’d have spoken to VAR they’d have given the goal but not if it was for City.
That’s corruption.
I have a feeling Attwell gets the league cup final & then we’ll all know. More importantly his colleagues will know how to impress.
Last edited: