PannickAtTheDisco
Well-Known Member
You have 66 posts in this thread, and he has 38. Which charity are you donating to fatbloke?
don't you have better things to do?
You have 66 posts in this thread, and he has 38. Which charity are you donating to fatbloke?
don't you have better things to do?
No, sadly not.
You have 66 posts in this thread, and he has 38. Which charity are you donating to fatbloke?
Agreed Ric...my worry is also that we will end up with a career ending challenge finally punished but that would be too late...Pep’s anger is totally understandable...wankers like Mason May well end up having blood on their hands,..they are meant to be in charge ffsI agree completely that the goal should have stood, that’s clear. I’m just laying the blame for that one with the linesman rather than Mason.
Regardless, I’m less arsed about that. It’s frustrating that such a good goal was wrongly ruled out, but the dangerous challenges that are consistently not being punished properly are the bigger concern for me. Something needs to be done about this as a matter of priority. It’s laughable that players can retrospectively be punished for diving, but not endangering an opponent’s safety (if they were booked at the time). The whole system is completely flawed.
If that’s the case I will happily donate £10 to the British Heart Foundation, pm with your email address and I’ll send the proof when it’s done in the morning.
If that’s the case I will happily donate £10 to the British Heart Foundation, pm with your email address and I’ll send the proof when it’s done in the morning.
There lies the issue, the blind suggest 'evens up over the season' but the odd one that goes our way isn't a game changer.Off the top of my head, our third against Arsenal when Silva was offside?
The ref's report will state the reason for the booking for the foul on Leroy, if this doesn't mention the high contact on his leg then why can't the FA charge the thug for endangering an opponent's safety with excessive force? If fairness to Mason he can't be expected to keep-up with play, when Leroy is running at full pace, so surely this would be anything against him. I think the same could be applied for all the challenges above. Pep is spot-on, there must be a change to protect the players the yellow card for a bad tackle is the same punishment for a minor infringement. Cardiff should have at least 5 yellow and one red but, because of the perception that poor old Cardiff were playing one of the best teams in Europe then they should be allowed extra leeway.
That tackle would never have happened had Mason signalled intent early doors as the ref in the rags game did on Friday. 20 seconds your in the book son i will not put up with that.And there was Nathan Blake and Lawrenson excusing this thuggery last night on MOTD as being part and parcel of Championship sides and we should basically man up.
For the first time ever watching City yestetfday, I was more concerned with the players safety than us actually scoring any more goals.
IN that case it was too obvious because he disallowed a goal.Any time I’ve read about match fixing and corrupt officiating, it has always been when referees have continuously given fifty fifty challenges a particular way, in order to influence the overall sway of the game.
It’s never on goal or red card decisions as that would be too obvious. I just saw rubbish refereeing today, that was it (to be honest, more rubbish from
the linesman, I do get how in real time, Mason might have missed the severity of the challenge on Sane).
And there was Nathan Blake and Lawrenson excusing this thuggery last night on MOTD as being part and parcel of Championship sides and we should basically man up.
For the first time ever watching City yestetfday, I was more concerned with the players safety than us actually scoring any more goals.
That tackle would never have happened had Mason signalled intent early doors as the ref in the rags game did on Friday. 20 seconds your in the book son i will not put up with that.
![]()
Apparently these aren't worthy of red card