www.theguardian.com
I don't recall Neville actually saying that to be fair.Apologies if posted elswhere, but this just reeks of a Sky Sports employee sticking his substantial nose in to an argument pertaining to one of Sky's favoured teams by putting pressure on the PGMOL. The **** knows exactly what he's doing here, and I bet his employers sanctioned it.
Football Insider (@footballinsider247official) on Threads
Post-match reactions are getting heated! ️ Wayne Rooney: “The Van Dijk goal should have stood. I don’t think Andy Robertson delayed Gianluigi Donnarumma diving.” ️ Gary Neville “It’s just blatant cheating. That is an embarrassing decision, really, really embarrassing.” VAR once again at the...www.threads.com
Another bent useless fucker still grifting a living.I’d rather Van Dijk’s goal stood, but it wasn’t a clear and obvious error to deny him | Chris Foy
While it was a highly subjective call, VAR is not there to re-referee decisions like the offside against Andy Robertson
A surprisingly clear explanation from one of the worst referees ever
Apologies if posted elswhere, but this just reeks of a Sky Sports employee sticking his substantial nose in to an argument pertaining to one of Sky's favoured teams by putting pressure on the PGMOL. The **** knows exactly what he's doing here, and I bet his employers sanctioned it.
Football Insider (@footballinsider247official) on Threads
Post-match reactions are getting heated! ️ Wayne Rooney: “The Van Dijk goal should have stood. I don’t think Andy Robertson delayed Gianluigi Donnarumma diving.” ️ Gary Neville “It’s just blatant cheating. That is an embarrassing decision, really, really embarrassing.” VAR once again at the...
He’s just repeated what Dermot Gallagher saidI’d rather Van Dijk’s goal stood, but it wasn’t a clear and obvious error to deny him | Chris Foy
While it was a highly subjective call, VAR is not there to re-referee decisions like the offside against Andy Robertson
A surprisingly clear explanation from one of the worst referees ever
It was the only time all match that Richarlison actually stayed on his feet? It seemed to get glossed over in all the uproar about handball.
Basically I was in full agreement with you, and you have my son's initials so well done.
Although that is probably the largest consideration in the decision, Robertson also moves right across Donnarumma while the ball is arriving on Van Dijk's head so of course he's going to be in his line of sight too.
But surely it’s got sod all to do with VAR. The on field decision was no goal. It was flagged offside. To overrule that there had to be sufficient evidence that a clear and obvious error had been made. No such evidence existed.
Yer right, N, a surprisingly clear explanation but wholly incorrect, which was often the case with Foy.I’d rather Van Dijk’s goal stood, but it wasn’t a clear and obvious error to deny him | Chris Foy
While it was a highly subjective call, VAR is not there to re-referee decisions like the offside against Andy Robertson
A surprisingly clear explanation from one of the worst referees ever
Sorry DE but that itself is incorrect. The explanation from Foy is spot on, its exactly as the protocol is written.
The "clear and obvious error" clause they always claim worked in our favour for a change?
So why was VAR allowed to re-referee that abomination of a goal in the Derby?I’d rather Van Dijk’s goal stood, but it wasn’t a clear and obvious error to deny him | Chris Foy
While it was a highly subjective call, VAR is not there to re-referee decisions like the offside against Andy Robertson
A surprisingly clear explanation from one of the worst referees ever
The laws have been constantly degraded as they've attempted to explain some decisions post-match - just look at the mess they've made of the handball law! The number of grey areas allow for both interpretations - yes, he's offside and his presence in an offside position is purely to interfere with Donnarumma's attempt to save, or yes, he's offside but he's not interfering! It's ridiculous, and the 'cognoscenti' in the studio start throwing in all kinds of irrelevant aspects that Donnarumma was never in a position to save it. The question solely centres around Robertson's nefarious activities in the goal area, and what he's done in an offside position should chalk off the goal.
That's just against City, imagine all the decisions in their favour against every other team.