I don't usually bother commenting on these forums but I was just stating a fact. I haven't ever been abusive to you so I don't think you need to refer to me as being 'hard of thinking'. And to say the allocation came out of the Cityzens allocation doesn't follow does it because if it was done on points for s/t holders primarily there would be no allocation for cityzens.I'll say this again for the hard of thinking. The allocation for those on the highest points came out of the Cityzens allocation, not the Seasoncard holders one.
So even if we'd just had a straight ballot for all seasoncard holders, there would be exactly the same number of tickets in the ballot as there are now. Except now there's a few hundred fewer people in the ballot, making the other seasoncard holders' chances in the ballot slightly better.
We've done seasoncard holders a favour doing it this way. I understand people saying it should be on points only (although neither the club nor City Matters agrees with that point of view). But people criticising the system we've come up with because some tickets are going to people like Sean Riley, Dave Wallace, @East Level 2 @Bill and others I know, who prioritise watching City above pretty well everything else, really need to stop moaning as if you haven't got the requisite points it doesn't affect you negatively in the slightest.
Your reference to Sean Riley, Dave Wallace etc - I have no problem with these guys getting tickets especially as a subscriber to KOTK. And for what it's worth I prioritise watching City above anything else especially bearing in mind until a year ago I lived 280 miles away from the Etihad and still went to every game home, and every away I could get a ticket for. I just haven't been able to do it for so long as some due to work/ distance etc. Referring back to KOTK I enjoy reading your contributions but I think you let yourself down on this forum on occasions with your language etc. Just rise above it.
Last edited: