Rewriting history

Try reading Huckleberry Finn as I did last week. The n-word is on practically every page. Now, in all honesty, that reflects how people thought and talked at the time. (US Southern States, pre-Civil War.) But I can understand how many people might be offended.

People are not, by and large, sufficiently educated to understand that times change and that words that were once acceptable are no longer so. Just because I read Huckleberry Finn it does not mean I am going to go around calling people of colour n*****s. Similarly, medieval people were very frank indeed. The street where brothels were was often called Gropec**t Lane. This wasn't just in one city, but I can't see any Council bringing back that name, can you? No matter how 'historic' it may be. But even respectable people would have called it that at the time. Chaucer's works, which were very bawdy indeed in places, were read out at court in mixed company. No one thought anything of it. If that was put on the BBC at 8.00 pm tonight, people would go hairless.

As for the Bible, it's been rewritten many times. The Bible generally used in church today was produced in the 1960s (I think) and is very different to the King James Version I grew up with. Similarly, if you go to a wedding or a funeral, the service now is not (generally) from the 1662 Book of Common Prayer because they think we're too thick to understand the 17th Century prose. And, by and large, they are right.

By the way, I don't pretend to have all the answers. I read Chaucer and Langland in 14th Century English and it's very hard to understand. I don't say everyone else should be forbidden to have 21st-century updates because the originals are better. No, not only do I not pretend to have the answers, I know I have none.
 
Just publish in the original and re-written forms and let people decide which they prefer.
It's called freedom of choice,which,apparently is how a democracy works.
I like that idea. But publishing is a business and they want to make maximum money and will do what it takes to get there. I imagine that with children's books they get a lot of pressure from teachers and librarians, as well as parents.
 
Just publish in the original and re-written forms and let people decide which they prefer.
It's called freedom of choice,which,apparently is how a democracy works.
That’s what they are now doing with Dahl after the backlash, what get some is that they’ve change the word fatty for enormous so what in a few years when some bleeding heart liberal thinks that’s wrong!
 
How do we progress if we're constantly rewriting works from the past?

The books are of their time and the attitudes that purveyed it.

Lots of intelligent debate will be lost by rewriting to reflect today's society on them.

Books are a record of the past, be it fiction or nonfiction and should remain in their correct language of their day. Regardless of peoples political persuasion now.
 
Is it Dambusters where the dog is called n***** ? There are times when it is right to blank words out as they now do with that film, but you can go too far the other way. I heard a song on Radio 1 the other day, 'I just killed my ex' they bleeped out the word killed !.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.