Mr Kobayashi
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 1 Oct 2020
- Messages
- 16,745
Im not sure what that has to do with not tolerating fools and dickheads.
Man up you big Jessie.
Im not sure what that has to do with not tolerating fools and dickheads.
Man up you big Jessie.
I think Ric should rewrite off topic. Think of all the comments about smashing birds, get your norks out, that’s gay etc.How do we progress if we're constantly rewriting works from the past?
The books are of their time and the attitudes that purveyed it.
Lots of intelligent debate will be lost by rewriting to reflect today's society on them.
Books are a record of the past, be it fiction or nonfiction and should remain in their correct language of their day. Regardless of peoples political persuasion now.
I'd be banned in a previous life.I think Ric should rewrite off topic. Think of all the comments about smashing birds, get your norks out, that’s gay etc.
We all go off the rails :-)I'd be banned in a previous life.
We had this issue at work.Then there’s this nonsense
apparently he wants the F word banned and gossip!Chief bans gossip and use of word 'fireman' at Greater Manchester Fire Service
"This needs to stop and the term permanently erased from our vocabulary. We employ firefighters not firemen"www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk
Try reading Huckleberry Finn as I did last week. The n-word is on practically every page. Now, in all honesty, that reflects how people thought and talked at the time. (US Southern States, pre-Civil War.) But I can understand how many people might be offended.
People are not, by and large, sufficiently educated to understand that times change and that words that were once acceptable are no longer so. Just because I read Huckleberry Finn it does not mean I am going to go around calling people of colour n*****s. Similarly, medieval people were very frank indeed. The street where brothels were was often called Gropec**t Lane. This wasn't just in one city, but I can't see any Council bringing back that name, can you? No matter how 'historic' it may be. But even respectable people would have called it that at the time. Chaucer's works, which were very bawdy indeed in places, were read out at court in mixed company. No one thought anything of it. If that was put on the BBC at 8.00 pm tonight, people would go hairless.
As for the Bible, it's been rewritten many times. The Bible generally used in church today was produced in the 1960s (I think) and is very different to the King James Version I grew up with. Similarly, if you go to a wedding or a funeral, the service now is not (generally) from the 1662 Book of Common Prayer because they think we're too thick to understand the 17th Century prose. And, by and large, they are right.
By the way, I don't pretend to have all the answers. I read Chaucer and Langland in 14th Century English and it's very hard to understand. I don't say everyone else should be forbidden to have 21st-century updates because the originals are better. No, not only do I not pretend to have the answers, I know I have none.
I worked for 40+ years at various truck and van main dealers in the Greater Manchester area .We had this issue at work.
We had a grade affectionately nicknamed Shed monkeys. A newbie complained saying it was bullying. A letter was sent out saying anyone using the term would be disciplined. The rest of that grade decided to have a poll and have agreed they would like to be renamed Shed Wookies.