Le Havre Oswald
Well-Known Member
Why why did you post in this thread thendan_bo said:And why, WHY, am I finding it so hard to give a shit?
Why why did you post in this thread thendan_bo said:And why, WHY, am I finding it so hard to give a shit?
The carriage is a replica of a Medieval cart called a 'Beer'Hamann Pineapple said:Another Clarkson petition being delivered ?
All looks a bit Steptoe & Son to me
Seems a lot of fuss to bury a dead guy.
Why Leicester anyway ? I thought he was Richard of York and didn't he kill a couple of kids ?
dan_bo said:And why, WHY, am I finding it so hard to give a shit?
True, a lot of current historians are leaning towards the possibility he wasn't involved, but I don't think we'll ever know.blue underpants said:The carriage is a replica of a Medieval cart called a 'Beer'Hamann Pineapple said:Another Clarkson petition being delivered ?
All looks a bit Steptoe & Son to me
Seems a lot of fuss to bury a dead guy.
Why Leicester anyway ? I thought he was Richard of York and didn't he kill a couple of kids ?
Leicester? Nearest to his last battle and death at Bosworth
Richard Duke Of Gloucester, not York
Never absolutely proved that he killed the Princes in the Tower
Ancient Citizen said:True, a lot of current historians are leaning towards the possibility he wasn't involved, but I don't think we'll ever know.blue underpants said:The carriage is a replica of a Medieval cart called a 'Beer'Hamann Pineapple said:Another Clarkson petition being delivered ?
All looks a bit Steptoe & Son to me
Seems a lot of fuss to bury a dead guy.
Why Leicester anyway ? I thought he was Richard of York and didn't he kill a couple of kids ?
Leicester? Nearest to his last battle and death at Bosworth
Richard Duke Of Gloucester, not York
Never absolutely proved that he killed the Princes in the Tower
The fact is, however, he was pretty well liked and admired during his short reign, and was something of a champion of the common man, for as much as that meant in those times.
Introduced 'bail' into English law, this meant any man awaiting trial who couldn't buy his way out of jail didn't need to spend years in prison awaiting trialAncient Citizen said:True, a lot of current historians are leaning towards the possibility he wasn't involved, but I don't think we'll ever know.blue underpants said:The carriage is a replica of a Medieval cart called a 'Beer'Hamann Pineapple said:Another Clarkson petition being delivered ?
All looks a bit Steptoe & Son to me
Seems a lot of fuss to bury a dead guy.
Why Leicester anyway ? I thought he was Richard of York and didn't he kill a couple of kids ?
Leicester? Nearest to his last battle and death at Bosworth
Richard Duke Of Gloucester, not York
Never absolutely proved that he killed the Princes in the Tower
The fact is, however, he was pretty well liked and admired during his short reign, and was something of a champion of the common man, for as much as that meant in those times.
The Tudors trashed him, Shakespear was their mouthpiecemackenzie said:Ancient Citizen said:True, a lot of current historians are leaning towards the possibility he wasn't involved, but I don't think we'll ever know.blue underpants said:The carriage is a replica of a Medieval cart called a 'Beer'
Leicester? Nearest to his last battle and death at Bosworth
Richard Duke Of Gloucester, not York
Never absolutely proved that he killed the Princes in the Tower
The fact is, however, he was pretty well liked and admired during his short reign, and was something of a champion of the common man, for as much as that meant in those times.
I agree, we will probably never know for certain. It's a typical British thing though to sense an 'injustice' and the whole Tudor propaganda thing has clouded any truths that might be there.
Yeah killing his nephews was very brave.garymj said:I watched this all day today thought it was very good very well done, tell you what, he didn't mind a ruck did he, right in the thick of it before they got him, very brave King.
The Tudors trashed him, Shakespear was their mouthpiece[/quoteblue underpants said:mackenzie said:Ancient Citizen said:True, a lot of current historians are leaning towards the possibility he wasn't involved, but I don't think we'll ever know.
The fact is, however, he was pretty well liked and admired during his short reign, and was something of a champion of the common man, for as much as that meant in those times.
I agree, we will probably never know for certain. It's a typical British thing though to sense an 'injustice' and the whole Tudor propaganda thing has clouded any truths that might be there.
blue underpants said:Never mind Son, X factor starts again soon, you can sit in front of your telly clapping along like a demented seal along with all the other numptys, and don't forget that marvel of chav tv Jeremy Kyle will be on sometime Tomorrow, oafdan_bo said:And why, WHY, am I finding it so hard to give a shit?