I see Rico is the modern day equivalent of Richard Edghill. I'm glad he's got a new contract. I'm not 100% sure where his best position is. Hopefully as he grows and matures he'll develop into the right back that we're currently missing.
He’s lot better than Edghill.I see Rico is the modern day equivalent of Richard Edghill. I'm glad he's got a new contract. I'm not 100% sure where his best position is. Hopefully as he grows and matures he'll develop into the right back that we're currently missing.
I meant in terms of the unnecessary grief that he gets amongst City fans. Granted it's nowhere near the same level as what Edghill used to be subjected to.He’s lot better than Edghill.
He is totally out of his depth in a physical manner which is ok when you are in control more than you are not. It's as simple as that. You didn't need to write a dissertation.I always find it interesting when folks point out he struggles in games in which everyone struggles.
Is this how folks analyze Gvardiol, Gundo, Kev, Phil, Haaland John, Ruben, Bernardo or Kyle?
Did i miss how those guys excelled when we were under heavy pressure or off our game?
Did Gvardiol not give up multiple goals under pressure? did Phil not suck and give up a goal when we werent on top? Was Kev not a mess in the games we couldn't control? Did Dias not struggle with Mbappe's pace in a game when we were shit?
So what are people really saying when pointing out the obvious. That our players struggle when we are not on top? ALL OF THEM!
Constantly bringing it up as if its unique to Rico is weird to me.
I judge him exactly how i judge others. How is
he when we are purring? He is fantastic! And that's all i can say.
He's a 20 year old kid, & he looked comfortably within his depth against Wolves to me...He is totally out of his depth in a physical manner which is ok when you are in control more than you are not. It's as simple as that. You didn't need to write a dissertation.
Did you even read what I wrote? He's a major asset when the game is played on his terms aka on the ball, in control. If called upon defensively, he's going to get exposed. This is not a controversial take, it's not a dig, it's just how it is. Surely no one actually thinks he's a good defender?He's a 20 year old kid, & he looked perfectly within his depth against Wolves to me...
is he? only joking. Bit gutted we did not haggle on this one see where we could have got them to. I'd have been happy with the reported 25 million. Would have been a nice chunk towards a new right back that would improve the team.He’s lot better than Edghill.
Mate, he defended as well as any other defender against Wolves & covered more positions than anyone else. He played the most complex multi-positional role on Saturday & excelled.Did you even read what I wrote? He's a major asset when the game is played on his terms aka on the ball, in control. If called upon defensively, he's going to get exposed. This is not a controversial take, it's not a dig, it's just how it is. Surely no one actually thinks he's a good defender?
Lol, prepare to be surprisedNothing against him i just don't think he's good enough to be s starter in any of the top 4 teams, as a squad player maybe he's worth keeping around, he's no right back and he's behind so many in midfield so if he starts 10 league games i'd be suprised.
Anyone got any idea how old he is ?
Did you even read what I wrote? He's a major asset when the game is played on his terms aka on the ball, in control. If called upon defensively, he's going to get exposed. This is not a controversial take, it's not a dig, it's just how it is. Surely no one actually thinks he's a good defender?
We lost control of the right side when he got replaced last weekend. He doesn't just thrive in a functioning possession side, he facilitates it.
Leroy Sane says helloThere are more ways of defending than crunching tackles and giving away free kicks. But yes his physicality is an issue at present.
We lost control of the right side when he got replaced last weekend. He doesn't just thrive in a functioning possession side, he facilitates it.
I'm certain he's going to bulk up slightly anyway. Males put in a fair bit of muscle 21-23. Phil isn't huge but looks at him now compared to 4-5 years ago. After 3 years of playing senior football whilst he's slight, if he does put on man weight he'll take a big jump.
No one looked good last year and the team fell apart so he gets a pass . Too young to sell and great potential . He is versatile and , with the best coach in the world , is going to find his best position , most likely midfield . Will be getting stronger as he matures too and is an intelligent player with the selfless heart of a lion. If he was playing down the road he'd be being hailed as The Second Coming .. probably a good thing he's under the radar with us .Nice, I'd never sell Lewis. He might never be good enough to be a starter but he'll always be a great backup (which you always need). Also, he's English which counts for a homegrown quota. I wish we kept McAtee as well for the same reasons but thankfully we have a buy-back option in case he turns into next Palmer xd
Born 23rd September 1974Anyone got any idea how old he is ?
Yeah, fair point.Well I think he will be our Neville. Not good enough but a solid squad player years to come and also a reason now for the board not to go for a RB. Having 2 fullbacks would be a disgrace for the board.