nashark said:
As you were typing JMA, I made another post in response to another poster which I felt addressed your view.
They are being driven by reckless opportunism and greed.
I guess that makes them equal to the engineers of their plight: the greedy, recklessly opportunist bankers who thrive when politics stays clear of economics.
Until the economy recognises moral desert, you will hear of the poor kids rioting, the avaricious Capitalists bringing down countries, the burglars getting stabbing to death in Salford. These will not go away.
All I'm suggesting is that we look at the root of the problem instead of losing our minds and wanting our brothers and sisters shot, burned, stabbed and hanged by the Establishment.
As I said, I feel this is a product of politics. I ask myself why we have a culture that is so fucking greedy and I can only return to the foibles of Capitalism.
I would agree that it is the product of politics. But it is the product of numerous political decisions over decades that have contributed to the rise of a culture that too often celebrates ignorance and violence (typing that I know I sound somewhat like people I can't stand, but I think in this case it's legit).
And it isn't the product of politics that aren;t similarly in place in every other Capitalist country. So, how many people in that crowd do you think have a genuine idealogical problem with capitalism as a way of life? Very few, I suspect.
It isn't a single issue. It isn't easily addressed. It isn't a product of contemporary economic issues.
We have to be really careful here. Where do you stop when you seek to constantly explore, dissect and try to solve the reasons for criminality. God knows, I've done enough of it in the past. At what point do you disagree with an action, treat it as purely a criminal act and separate it from political issues. There must be some point because you can go as far as you want down that road. I could link political issues that allow a society to develop a Harold Shipman or a Fred West, but no-one views them in the light of political events, current and past.
But I won't excuse to any extent pure, wanton destruction that exhibits nothing but a desire to indulge in criminality for criminality's sake.
I would be the first to look for political solutions to improve society and address inequality. And I'll continue to do so when this dies down and can be dissected properly. Only a moron (or Mail reader) would not do so. But by linking the events of last night with immediate and contemporary political issues it gives them far too much legitimacy. Legitimacy that they don't deserve.
It seems a strange thing to say that they don't deserve the 'respect' afforded to rioters in the instances mentioned in the past - riots which I might have understood to varying extents and whose cause I may have supported, despite them undoubtedly also containing some vary unsavoury people. But this is nothing as noble (if there can be a noble riot).
Can you honestly say that you think people last night had a sense of 'justice' in their action, even a misguided one? I don't buy it. To my knowledge, genuinely motivated crowds riot in a totally different way. Sure, some involved will do some of the shite involved last night. But for that to be the sole aim of a riot. Nah, I don't buy it.