I’m simply telling it like it is, which is probably why you don’t like it.
Anyway, just a quick one on Macpherson, and why I think his comments are particularly disingenuous and aimed simply at broadening his appeal as a pundit now that he is out of the civil service.
As you will no doubt be aware, the fiscal mandate he helped the Chancellor design and which operated from 2010 to 2015 focussed on the current budget deficit, a measure which of course excludes net government investment. So the mandate actually allowed for higher investment spending, and yet they still made the decision not to significantly increase it because of the concern around borrowing costs and debt levels. So his attempts to rewrite history don’t really cut it with me, because if the case for higher investment was so obvious, and the risks of doing so very low, then they would have done it.
Again, I have to say that I’m surprised you haven’t mentioned this point about the mandate given your in depth knowledge on the matter. Not just this subject, of course; pretty much anything anyone says on here, you mark yourself out as the expert. Even, I remember (could hardly forget to be fair), the matter of Catherine Middleton’s dress sense. Or perhaps you have strong views about how women in their early 40s in general should dress, and not just the Princess of Wales. I’d hate to do you a disservice and sell your talents short.
Have a great day.