You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Rishi Sunak
- Thread starter west didsblue
- Start date
maxwellblue
Well-Known Member
haha, reallyThere is no evidence that the royal family bring in anything at all.
Well show me some.haha, really
maxwellblue
Well-Known Member
Well IMO he wasn't.He wa right though. Think he might be slightly better informed on trans issues than you, me or Sunak.
maxwellblue
Well-Known Member
Google is your friendWell show me some.
Never seen any reliable tourist research on the royal family. You pooh poohed my point, Google is your friend is no response.Google is your friend
blueparrot
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 7 Jun 2012
- Messages
- 29,522
Wasn't what ? better informed ,of course he was having had a trans child,and the isses they suffered, I haven't, Sunak hasn't and given your attitude pretty sure you haven't either.Well IMO he wasn't.
"Would you visit the UK if you could wander round or stay in a former royal palace?"Never seen any reliable tourist research on the royal family. You pooh poohed my point, Google is your friend is no response.
meltonblue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 14 May 2013
- Messages
- 7,031
It wasn't a joke, he pointed out that Starmer can't tell us what a woman is, which is true. I really don't think that the pond life that would stab someone 14 times would watch PMQ's.
Starmers continuously stuck to the legal definition hasn’t he? That Sunak thinks it’s a point of contention he can go after rather than sticking to the legal definition himself, particularly given he’s the PM, is worrying in itself.
maxwellblue
Well-Known Member
No, I was answering the point the poster he made about the father being correct.Wasn't what ? better informed ,of course he was having had a trans child,and the isses they suffered, I haven't, Sunak hasn't and given your attitude pretty sure you haven't either.