Rival Fans Commentating on City Games

Spit stated Chelsea were the better team , he has to be the only prick who came to that conclusion , only one team was camped in the opposition half trying to win the game for the last 20 minutes whilst Chelsea fed on scraps , really hope we hammer the Dippers in a couple of weeks and he is commentating , he will be squirming so much he might have to gob on another child on his way home . scum
He’s just one big bag of nauseating phlegm, spitting Jamie Carraghers at people …!
 
It was absolutely pathetic, as clear a pen you will ever see, not only that spitty kept saying it hit Erlings hand for his other goal...did it fuck,
He didn't say the foul wasn't worthy of a penalty though did he? He said their was a pull by Haaland before the foul which should of have lead to a free kick to Chelsea but that VAR didn't go far enough back to look at it.
He was also about to blow a gasket when it looked like Haaland's 2nd might be ruled out for handball.
 
Sky spend a huge amount of their budget on Neville and Carragher, which is why the likes of Delaney, Reddy, Ogden, Cross and the transfer dickhead get airtime as cheap fillers. The standard of their football coverage is the worst it has ever been, it’s the TV version of Talkshite just without the Hedgehog Gutter Brush.
Chief Reporter Reddy by the way ...
 
Lets face it that is what it is when Caragher and Neville are the pundits.

Cant the club do ANYTHING about it? I mean for us City fans it is aaawwwwful, totally spoils the game unless you switch them off. Rival fans feel the same.

But for me, I think it is down to the club to do something about. These twats are representing our club on the national broadcasters, the first thing potential new City fans (And global fans) hear when the commentary is on City is negativity. All the way through with only cursory acknowledgement of anything positive. Its a totally unfair coverage, even taking into account how everyone is hoping we get beat this year. I can understand that, but its borderline lies that they are telling on our coverage.

The evidence is there for all (Except those blind and deaf to it), we get a shit representation on Sky Sports, cant the club order the PL to actually give us fair coverage? I mean get lawyers involved. Or is that too far?
Had SWP on my stream yesterday
 
Mark Chapman is a Rag as has been said on here before, he will 'admit' to that but always seems fair and objective. We don't want pundits blowing smoke up our arse (which often comes across as fake) but credit where it is due and also criticism is fine from pundits when warranted. Intelligent, rational comments can't be that much to ask for? Personally I'd like to see Andy Morrison as a pundit. Our old mate is very good on the City website, he obviously does have a soft spot for us but is honest and gives the other team credit when it is deserved and will say if he thinks City have 'got away with one'.
You get the feeling that he wouldn't take any shit from those other red shirt muppets in the studio either (which is probably why he wouldn't get the job in the first place!).
agree strongly, AM talks more sense in one game than all the rest in a season, his loyalty to City is never in doubt, but never gets in the way accurate commentary. Unlike nearly all ex-pros behind a mic.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.