robin van persie (continued)

[Freestyler]

Not happening.

Opinion or fact?

both.

 

[LongsightM13]

Not happening.

Opinion or fact?

both.

So is he already selling his new house in Manchester that you insisted he had bought?

 

[richards30]

Opinion or fact?

both.

So is he already selling his new house in Manchester that you insisted he had bought?

busted!!!!!

 

[bobmcfc]

both.

So is he already selling his new house in Manchester that you insisted he had bought?

busted!!!!!

popcorn cat

 

[Freestyler]

Opinion or fact?

both.

So is he already selling his new house in Manchester that you insisted he had bought?

So cause he isn't coming, means he can't have a house in Manchester does it?

both.

So is he already selling his new house in Manchester that you insisted he had bought?

busted!!!!!

for what exactly?

 

[richards30]

both.

So is he already selling his new house in Manchester that you insisted he had bought?

So cause he isn't coming, means he can't have a house in Manchester does it?

So is he already selling his new house in Manchester that you insisted he had bought?

busted!!!!!

for what exactly?

does fbloke know that you quote his info as your own?? or has he asked you to do it on his behalf??

 

[Freestyler]

So is he already selling his new house in Manchester that you insisted he had bought?

So cause he isn't coming, means he can't have a house in Manchester does it?

busted!!!!!

for what exactly?

does fbloke know that you quote his info as your own?? or has he asked you to do it on his behalf??

I never quote what he says as my own, he told me this though.

But i already knew anyway, and that's not who told me about it first either.

 

[Salar]

City are better off without Robin Van Persie

First of all I will admit that Van Persie is one of the best strikers in the world.However I don't want him in Manchester City.He will always be remembered for his time in Arsenal,he won't we be in good form after a poor euro 2012 and it would be good business for arsenal to sell before he starts to decline.He is gonna be 30 in a year and we will be his retirement home.And he is a ****.Their are better and cheaper options available.I always supported Mancini's signings because he bought players that haven't reached their prime yet but Van Persie is past his best and its all downhill from here.And because I don't want him to be with us when we are successful e.g. I dont want him to be associated with City and where we are headed.Are these Valid points or Is it that I dislike him.

 

[X-toThe-V]

Why buy a injury prone euro flop when you can have the third best player in the world for the same price

 

[SharstonBlue]

Re: City are better off without Robin Van Persie

On the basis of his performances in the last three games for Holland, I wouldn't pay 10p for him...

 

[Aguero_Element]

Re: City are better off without Robin Van Persie

i dont want him either, he is a dick

 

[IOWBlue]

Re: City are better off without Robin Van Persie

regardless of the euros, i dont want him.

 

[880125]

Re: City are better off without Robin Van Persie

Spot on mate. He should do what his dad tells him and stay put. I don't want him anywhere near City, even though last year it was him that got the Arse into 3rd place. He is an excellent player, but surely there are better and younger ones out there.

 

[maps]

Re: City are better off without Robin Van Persie

I hope he comes he is absolutely amazing player

 

[TGR]

Re: City are better off without Robin Van Persie

Can't help but agree. He is to old and will be far to expensive. When you think we paid circa £24m for Augero we can get much better value elsewhere.

 

[babeblue60s]

I dont think Aguero has enough in his locker to spearhead the attack of European contenders, he is not a physical presence nor as clinical as should be, he is small, skillful & can dribble thus maybe can be accomodated down the middle. We need a top Central foward(RVP, Falcao ect.) if we can tussle with the likes of Bayern, Barca, Chelsea without being totally outclassed

 

[Gareth Barry Manilow]

fbloke ..?

 

[VOOMER]

I dont think Aguero has enough in his locker to spearhead the attack of European contenders, he is not a physical presence nor as clinical as should be, he is small, skillful & can dribble thus maybe can be accomodated down the middle. We need a top Central foward(RVP, Falcao ect.) if we can tussle with the likes of Bayern, Barca, Chelsea without being totally outclassed

?

 

[geoffchall]

Re: City are better off without Robin Van Persie

He always seemed such a sour little shit when he was younger and even now there isn't that much joy in what he does, even if he does do it very well. He's not alone - there's a number of players who I can see are highly skilled who I would hate seeing at the club. When Rooney was having his strop the other year, I was dreading the prospect of his being signed, not because he's a red, just because he's gobby, sour-faced git. The same applies to Ronaldo, Sturridge, Terry (when he could run), Suarez, Tim Cahill and a few others. I just cross my fingers and hope that the rumours or such go away.

 

[forevermancity]

Re: City are better off without Robin Van Persie

Can't help but agree. He is to old and will be far to expensive. When you think we paid circa £24m for Augero we can get much better value elsewhere.

thats a big circa you have there, £14m difference ;)