the talisman
Well-Known Member
Tony101 said:The difference between Nasri and RVP is very simple from business point of view.Davs 19 said:Tevez City said:Arsenal played it right this summer, they bought the replacement already and know they can wait until the last day to sell RVP.
Or not, as the case may be. Others may see them desperate to sell and recoup their cash, given the clubs business model of the last few years.
Worst case scenario, we keep the four strikers we have and have the strongest frontline in the Prem.
Best case scenario, Cavani or Falcao and RVP sign and we get rid of Tevez at last and, sadly, offload Edin.This plus Martinez would make my summer.
nasri was bought for 15 million and was 24 years old.....letting him see out his contract at the age of 24 was never gonna happen.
RVP was bought for 2.75 million and they got 8 years from him. They can afford to see him out his contract if they dont get the right offer and they already bought 2 strikers. Van persie is a fantastic striker, but I really dont get this one man team nonsense as he had a team build around him last season. basically they all played to feed him and despite being top scorer he had by far more chances than any other striker in the league. The guy misses crazy amount of chances
24 (nasri) or 28 (RVP), is irrelevant, there is no way that arse will let him run his contract down, they'd be throwing away 20 million.