robin van persie (continued)

Status
Not open for further replies.
I like how it's Mancini that has been told he must sell the flops when I thought this was fucking Marwood job.
 
LoveCity said:
Manchester City transfer chief Brian Marwood is set to jeopardise the club’s bid to sign Robin van Persie by refusing to make him their highest-paid player.

And that will delight ­rivals United, who believe they can win the race for Van Persie if City do not blow the bank.

Marwood is already at odds with City boss Roberto Mancini over Van Persie, with the Italian desperate to land the Dutchman.

City had a £15m bid for Van Persie rejected and Mancini has been told he must sell some of his flops to clear the way for a new offer closer to Arsenal’s £20m asking price.

Arsene Wenger returns from Arsenal’s ­pre-season tour to Asia ­tomorrow and will hold ­another round of talks with Van Persie.

But even if Van Persie ­cannot be convinced to change his mind and City do agree a fee with the ­Gunners, Mancini can no longer count on the club ­offering the player vast sums of money to snub United and Juventus.

Mancini had assumed City would offer Van Persie a salary close to the £225,000-a-week that ­highest-paid player Yaya Toure earns, but Marwood is set to dash that hope.

City already have big problems trying to sell ­Emmanuel ­Adebayor and Roque Santa Cruz due to their huge wage packets.

And Marwood believes it would be a significant and unnecessary risk to pay Van Persie, who turns 29 next month and has a poor ­injury record, any more than £150,000 a week.

Van Persie is already ­understood to favour a move to United or Juve and Marwood’s wage cap will only make it more ­difficult for City to convince the Dutchman to change his mind.

Arsenal were ready to offer Van Persie £130,000-a-week and a £5m signing-on fee before he said he would not sign a new contract.

United pay Wayne ­Rooney £200,000 a week and could match City’s reduced ­salary offer.

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/transfer-news/robin-van-persie-man-city-1179999" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/ ... ty-1179999</a>
Click to expand...

The Mirror has been on a mission to write some shit on the RVP saga recently but this is Middle Earth stuff.
 
Buying, selling we've been made to look like mugs in the past it's time now to play hard ball! We have a quality squad with good back ups, nows the time to reduce the wages we pay when we buy new players to around about the same as Kompany got signing his new contract 130k..
 
BobKowalski said:
LoveCity said:
Manchester City transfer chief Brian Marwood is set to jeopardise the club’s bid to sign Robin van Persie by refusing to make him their highest-paid player.

And that will delight ­rivals United, who believe they can win the race for Van Persie if City do not blow the bank.

Marwood is already at odds with City boss Roberto Mancini over Van Persie, with the Italian desperate to land the Dutchman.

City had a £15m bid for Van Persie rejected and Mancini has been told he must sell some of his flops to clear the way for a new offer closer to Arsenal’s £20m asking price.

Arsene Wenger returns from Arsenal’s ­pre-season tour to Asia ­tomorrow and will hold ­another round of talks with Van Persie.

But even if Van Persie ­cannot be convinced to change his mind and City do agree a fee with the ­Gunners, Mancini can no longer count on the club ­offering the player vast sums of money to snub United and Juventus.

Mancini had assumed City would offer Van Persie a salary close to the £225,000-a-week that ­highest-paid player Yaya Toure earns, but Marwood is set to dash that hope.

City already have big problems trying to sell ­Emmanuel ­Adebayor and Roque Santa Cruz due to their huge wage packets.

And Marwood believes it would be a significant and unnecessary risk to pay Van Persie, who turns 29 next month and has a poor ­injury record, any more than £150,000 a week.

Van Persie is already ­understood to favour a move to United or Juve and Marwood’s wage cap will only make it more ­difficult for City to convince the Dutchman to change his mind.

Arsenal were ready to offer Van Persie £130,000-a-week and a £5m signing-on fee before he said he would not sign a new contract.

United pay Wayne ­Rooney £200,000 a week and could match City’s reduced ­salary offer.

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/transfer-news/robin-van-persie-man-city-1179999" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/ ... ty-1179999</a>
Click to expand...

The Mirror has been on a mission to write some shit on the RVP saga recently but this is Middle Earth stuff.
Click to expand...

Yeah it is but it is the Sunday special bollocks goes up 200% in Sunday papers
 
I agree with Marwood on this one, City don't need RVP so badly and thats why they shouldn't pay him +200 K a week as reported.
 
Funny thing but even though that Mirror article tries to stir the shit with Mancini and Marwood it does the exact opposite. If those were the costs then you'd have to back Marwood on that one and we are well aware that Mancini isn't stupid.

Shite article that only a moron could believe.
 
Thenumber1blue said:
waspish said:
Rodney Marsh just said his ketchup says city will pay what RVP wants ;-/
Click to expand...
I'm sure I just read that we wouldn't .
Click to expand...


This is his tweety pie

My sources tell me if #MCFC will pay his wage demands RVP is there's & the No10 shirt
 
If the papers are right (I think they are bollocks) whats the point in bidding for him if we aint going to match his salry.

These are Baconfaces bum chums doing him a favour, comes on saying he is the man rags want, to flog tickets and shares, knowing full well they cant afford him, now they are saying if we get him it will only be for the money, same line as was used against Nasri, RVP has said all along not about money but being sucessful, rags couldn't stand being snubbed on that basis hence this made up bollocks. IMO
 
LoveCity said:
Marsh said we WON'T pay him what he wants.
Click to expand...

This is a screen photo of the tweeter feed He does say iF
5213f194-5d99-105e.jpg
 
Rammyblues said:
If the papers are right (I think they are bollocks) whats the point in bidding for him if we aint going to match his salry.

These are Baconfaces bum chums doing him a favour, comes on saying he is the man rags want, to flog tickets and shares, knowing full well they cant afford him, now they are saying if we get him it will only be for the money, same line as was used against Nasri, RVP has said all along not about money but being sucessful, rags couldn't stand being snubbed on that basis hence this made up bollocks. IMO
Click to expand...


Sweet isn't it?

I'm loving it.
 
Rammyblues said:
If the papers are right (I think they are bollocks) whats the point in bidding for him if we aint going to match his salry.

These are Baconfaces bum chums doing him a favour, comes on saying he is the man rags want, to flog tickets and shares, knowing full well they cant afford him, now they are saying if we get him it will only be for the money, same line as was used against Nasri, RVP has said all along not about money but being sucessful, rags couldn't stand being snubbed on that basis hence this made up bollocks. IMO
Click to expand...

So if we sign him RVP he should say I'm on same money here what the scum offered so frankly it's not about the money
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top