robin van persie (continued)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Plain Speaking said:
Juve now bookies favourites (1.73), Rags next (2.1), us 3rd (2.75), Skybet.
Not much in it, probably reflects the clubs' bids are fairly close and Arsenal wont want to sell to a PL rival.
Juve will do. As long as its not us!
 
Plain Speaking said:
Juve now bookies favourites (1.73), Rags next (2.1), us 3rd (2.75), Skybet.
Not much in it, probably reflects the clubs' bids are fairly close and Arsenal wont want to sell to a PL rival.



It doesn't reflect anything of the sort, it is merely an indication of bets placed by people who have no knowledge of any bid values.
 
JosMCFC said:
On a different note 90% on here want marwood out we still haven't replaced Gary cook instead of taking all arsenal's players why don't we make a move for Ivan Gazidis (arsenal chief ex) he is a lifelong city fan & maybe that's why he has sold so many players to us & hopefully RVP aswell

Are you a tabloid journalist by any chance? I ask this because your facts and assumptions are way off the credible radar.
 
JosMCFC said:
On a different note 90% on here want marwood out we still haven't replaced Gary cook instead of taking all arsenal's players why don't we make a move for Ivan Gazidis (arsenal chief ex) he is a lifelong city fan & maybe that's why he has sold so many players to us & hopefully RVP aswell

Do they ? Sorry, which way did I vote ??
 
pfazz said:
Plain Speaking said:
Juve now bookies favourites (1.73), Rags next (2.1), us 3rd (2.75), Skybet.
Not much in it, probably reflects the clubs' bids are fairly close and Arsenal wont want to sell to a PL rival.



It doesn't reflect anything of the sort, it is merely an indication of bets placed by people who have no knowledge of any bid values.
Please note the word "probably." No one is certain what the 3 bids are apart from Arsenal.
There has been media reports on the bid values, (possibly leaked by Arsenal?).
How do you know there is "no knowledge of any bid values" and media reports are "inaccurate" unless you are privy to the bids yourself?
Media reports frequently influence betting patterns.
 
pfazz said:
Plain Speaking said:
Juve now bookies favourites (1.73), Rags next (2.1), us 3rd (2.75), Skybet.
Not much in it, probably reflects the clubs' bids are fairly close and Arsenal wont want to sell to a PL rival.



It doesn't reflect anything of the sort, it is merely an indication of bets placed by people who have no knowledge of any bid values.

Yeah im not sure some people understand how betting moves on transfers
 
moomba said:
JosMCFC said:
On a different note 90% on here want marwood out

Do they? I must have missed the voting slip in the mail.

It's an "8 out of 10 cats" thing.<br /><br />-- Tue Jul 24, 2012 9:32 am --<br /><br />
St Helens Blue (Exiled) said:
Talk sport, Daily Mirror , Daily Fail , John Cross, Matt Scott..Deary deary me.

Can't you just smell the fear....

Mostly in here, from folk who say it's all rubbish then do a Corporal Jones for 82 pages.
 
BoyBlue_1985 said:
pfazz said:
Plain Speaking said:
Juve now bookies favourites (1.73), Rags next (2.1), us 3rd (2.75), Skybet.
Not much in it, probably reflects the clubs' bids are fairly close and Arsenal wont want to sell to a PL rival.



It doesn't reflect anything of the sort, it is merely an indication of bets placed by people who have no knowledge of any bid values.

Yeah im not sure some people understand how betting moves on transfers



Very much this. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
 
St Helens Blue (Exiled) said:
Talk sport, Daily Mirror , Daily Fail , John Cross, Matt Scott..Deary deary me.

Can't you just smell the fear....

Why look at the facts

Mancini was not allowed to spend in January, to date he is also being restricted in his transfer targets, there are numerous reports about City having to sell before we can buy and our transfer activity to date Hazard apart is pretty much nil - and we pulled out of Hazard because of money - yes agents fee but it was money related none the less

I think people on here are kidding themselves

There are clearly transfer restrictions in place - bombs aint dropping and we play Chelski in a few weeks time with arguably a lesser team than we had last season

The other thing that we also have to accept is that Citys administrators are clearly worried about FFFP and that we dont have an alternative but to comply
 
dctid said:
St Helens Blue (Exiled) said:
Talk sport, Daily Mirror , Daily Fail , John Cross, Matt Scott..Deary deary me.

Can't you just smell the fear....

Why look at the facts

Mancini was not allowed to spend in January, to date he is also being restricted in his transfer targets, there are numerous reports about City having to sell before we can buy and our transfer activity to date Hazard apart is pretty much nil - and we pulled out of Hazard because of money - yes agents fee but it was money related none the less

I think people on here are kidding themselves

There are clearly transfer restrictions in place - bombs aint dropping and we play Chelski in a few weeks time with arguably a lesser team than we had last season

The other thing that we also have to accept is that Citys administrators are clearly worried about FFFP and that we dont have an alternative but to comply


Why a lesser team?
 
[bigimg]http://www.poland2012.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/michel_platini.jpg[/bigimg]

Did he open his mouth regarding PSG spending ? or he keeps his exclusives for City only ?
 
whicko said:
dctid said:
St Helens Blue (Exiled) said:
Talk sport, Daily Mirror , Daily Fail , John Cross, Matt Scott..Deary deary me.

Can't you just smell the fear....

Why look at the facts

Mancini was not allowed to spend in January, to date he is also being restricted in his transfer targets, there are numerous reports about City having to sell before we can buy and our transfer activity to date Hazard apart is pretty much nil - and we pulled out of Hazard because of money - yes agents fee but it was money related none the less

I think people on here are kidding themselves

There are clearly transfer restrictions in place - bombs aint dropping and we play Chelski in a few weeks time with arguably a lesser team than we had last season

The other thing that we also have to accept is that Citys administrators are clearly worried about FFFP and that we dont have an alternative but to comply


Why a lesser team?

Barry still crocked - DJ appears ot have been cut from the Asia tour amid reports about an 8M move to Bayern

Our midfield is an issue why the fook we are chasing Van Persie i dont fookin know
 
Tevez City said:
[bigimg]http://www.poland2012.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/michel_platini.jpg[/bigimg]

Did he open his mouth regarding PSG spending ? or he keeps his exclusives for City only ?
Or Chavski for that matter

I´d like to see us come out with a cleverly worded statement challenging WAFFA over FFP
 
dctid said:
St Helens Blue (Exiled) said:
Talk sport, Daily Mirror , Daily Fail , John Cross, Matt Scott..Deary deary me.

Can't you just smell the fear....

Why look at the facts

Mancini was not allowed to spend in January, to date he is also being restricted in his transfer targets, there are numerous reports about City having to sell before we can buy and our transfer activity to date Hazard apart is pretty much nil - and we pulled out of Hazard because of money - yes agents fee but it was money related none the less

I think people on here are kidding themselves

There are clearly transfer restrictions in place - bombs aint dropping and we play Chelski in a few weeks time with arguably a lesser team than we had last season

The other thing that we also have to accept is that Citys administrators are clearly worried about FFFP and that we dont have an alternative but to comply

A lesser team?

As we haven't bought or sold anyone would you like to explain why we will be inferior this coming season?
 
mad zab said:
dctid said:
St Helens Blue (Exiled) said:
Talk sport, Daily Mirror , Daily Fail , John Cross, Matt Scott..Deary deary me.

Can't you just smell the fear....

Why look at the facts

Mancini was not allowed to spend in January, to date he is also being restricted in his transfer targets, there are numerous reports about City having to sell before we can buy and our transfer activity to date Hazard apart is pretty much nil - and we pulled out of Hazard because of money - yes agents fee but it was money related none the less

I think people on here are kidding themselves

There are clearly transfer restrictions in place - bombs aint dropping and we play Chelski in a few weeks time with arguably a lesser team than we had last season

The other thing that we also have to accept is that Citys administrators are clearly worried about FFFP and that we dont have an alternative but to comply

A lesser team?

As we haven't bought or sold anyone would you like to explain why we will be inferior this coming season?

Just answered this look a few posts above
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top