i dont know why we are focussing on a striker so much anyway, we have four top class ones. my preffered position would be cb, then wingers. not meaning for starters but we need better back up in them positions imo, savic should be loaned out cos he looks dodgy and short of confidence every time he plays, toure is finished. richards is ok there but better at rb. boyata isnt city standard either. i personally love when we play with a winger such as aj. but dont think we have any one else who is capable of playing that position. my top three transfers for city this year were thiago silva, cavani (if tev, balo or dzeko left) and bale.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
robin van persie (continued)
- Thread starter Prodigal Son
- Start date
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
Murdo22 said:i dont know why we are focussing on a striker so much anyway, we have four top class ones. my preffered position would be cb, then wingers. not meaning for starters but we need better back up in them positions imo, savic should be loaned out cos he looks dodgy and short of confidence every time he plays, toure is finished. richards is ok there but better at rb. boyata isnt city standard either. i personally love when we play with a winger such as aj. but dont think we have any one else who is capable of playing that position. my top three transfers for city this year were thiago silva, cavani (if tev, balo or dzeko left) and bale.
Who says we are focusing on a striker? We all have absolutely no idea what we are focusing on! Don't believe everything the papers say
Thenumber1blue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 19 Apr 2009
- Messages
- 5,904
+2GFBlue said:SWP's back said:I'll back whatever the gaffer decides if it's all the same.Salar said:We don't want Van Persie fuck that old **** he are far better without him.Having a ego like Van Persie will be a huge problem.He wont want to sit on the bench.He is a ****.And I have had it enough of buying arsenal players.I will be dissapointed with Mancini if he signs rvp.Aguero>Rvp,Tevez>rvp,Balotelli>rvp.And at 220kper week fuck u.
+1
Count me in as well.Thenumber1blue said:+2GFBlue said:SWP's back said:I'll back whatever the gaffer decides if it's all the same.
+1
mcfcliam
Well-Known Member
RVP is 10 times the player Dzeko is and we'd get a good 4/5 years out of him.
Break the bank City.
Break the bank City.
mcfcliam said:RVP is 10 times the player Dzeko is and we'd get a good 4/5 years out of him.
Break the bank City.
yes he is better than dzeko, but he wont start all the time so is it worth spending all the extra money on him? and he would also disrupt the harmony...... 4/5 years out of him? settle. he has had one injury free season in how long? id rather have cavani,neymar, pato, higauin or falcao!
+1mcfcliam said:RVP is 10 times the player Dzeko is and we'd get a good 4/5 years out of him.
Break the bank City.
abu13
Well-Known Member
i trust Mancini but i can't say i am convinced with RVP, unless there is something going on with Tevez that we don't know about.
i think we need a couple of wingers as options when things are tight.
i think we need a couple of wingers as options when things are tight.
Edited for accuracy :-)CityCTID said:-1mcfcliam said:RVP is 10 times the player Dzeko is and we'd get a good 4/5 years out of him.
Break the bank City.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.