kun
Well-Known Member
I tend to disagree...Matt.D said:Ovo said:If Kompany had a long term injury, Micah would be moved to CB and Zaba right back. So no we wouldn't struggle for the top 4. Ridiculous thing to say.
Micah is not a centre back. Dont get me wrong as an emergency or when there are injuries then he can do a job there but he would be badly exposed against the better strikers in that position over a long term basis.
Youve got your opinion and thats fine, but look back at the games when Kompany was injured last season, look what an absolute mess we were. Look how shit forwards were running riot creating chances against us.
A lot of the time our forwards made up for it and got us out of the shit, i,e tottenham at home, but over the course of the season missing Vinnie, this team would finish way off the title pace put it that way.
Micah is, indeed, not a centre back but is much more capable of playing that position than you seem to make out as he showed against Chelsea at home last season as well as for team GB. Especially if part of a back three which Mancini seems to be more than just contemplating in this preseason (and he also experimented with this at the end of matches and vs Liverpool in the League Cup semi).
Also, a reason we where so poor defensively in that spell was because both Kolo and Yaya where at the African Cup of Nations, along Zabaleta being injured/not fully fit, forcing Micah to play right back and Savic to play at centre back rather than third choice Kolo or Micah. Yaya being out forced NDJ and Barry to try and pose more of a threat in an attacking sense leaving the defence less protected, further highlighting Savic's weaknesses.
This compared to United, who have similar quality backups in that position started poorly defensively but swept teams aside because of their attacking form, this bad-ish defensive form lasted around two months or so (being highlighted tremendously when city came to the swamp) whereas ours lasted around 1 month (until Vinnie came back). Had he been out for the same length of time as Vidic Micah and Joleon or Kolo and Joleon would have firstly been better than the defence with Savic and secondly they would have worked up a partnership by this point making us far, far less than easy to break down.
In proposition of where we might have finished, I believe a defence of Zab-Micah-JLo-Clichy with a worked-up understanding between Micah and Joleon is superior to that of Arsenal last season or currently (Djourou-Koscielny-Vermaelen-Gibbs // Sagna-Koscienly-Vermaelen-Santos), Spurs' team then (Walker-King-Kaboul-BAE), and Newcastle's at that point (Simpson-Coloccini-Perch-Santon). This added to the fact we clearly have a better attack than anyone else in the league means we would have been up there in the top three although probably not winning it in the end. So, I agree with Ovo, I also don't think that we would struggle to make top four.
Just my opinion of course.