blueyorkie
Well-Known Member
kun said:There's no way Silva's worth less than £24msupercity88 said:Funnily enough I actually think we should be playing the football manager transfer strategy and not the diamonds in the rough, shrewd market. With a lot of our wage restructuring etc we have enough cash to bring in some real quality. We need to be looking at European rivals and not just domestic. Chelsea have managed to get Costa and Fabregas for relatively cheaply, especially when you see what the rags and liverpool have spent on younger english players.
I've said a few times that City's ageing squad means we are losing a lot of money on any value uplift of players. We can't for instance do what Chelsea or Real or Barca have been able to do and sell a big player and replace with another big player who is more needed. Mata and Luiz for Fabregas and Costa (plus change). Ozil and Di Maria for Rodriguez and Kroos. Sanchez helped with the Suarez signing.
Our best players, apart from Zabba, Kompany, Hart and Aguero, are all worth lower fees than we paid in general. Largely down to their age. If we now target the likes of Pogba, Barkley, Reus and pay reasonable money for them, there is nothing to say that in the future their value increases. Maybe Real decide they want Barkley or Pogba in 4 years time - likelihood is they will cost an extra £20m to what we pay this/next year. Why take the risk on unproven English or domestic players? Jones, Smalling, Young, Carroll, Downing... all commanded big fees and haven't really repaid that. Their value is no more than what their clubs spent for them - in the latter two cases it went down a lot.
We have been shrewd with Fernando and have added Mangala, who could be worth £50m plus based on Luiz' cost last summer if he proves himself.
I don't believe that Vinny or Zaba are worth less than the £6 or £8m we paid either. Sergio must be worth £50-£60 m at least