Jacob Smith
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Sep 2014
- Messages
- 2,011
I was already aware he had a rather lengthy & varied CV, but that alone doesn't make him appropriate for the England job!Do you know anything about football? Like, at all?
Hodgson’s CV far eclipsed anything Harry Redknapp, the other contender at the time, ever achieved.
Hodgson already had plenty of international experience as a manager before being appointed England manager.
Seven league titles in Sweden, 1 league title in Denmark, two UEFA Europa League runners up medals with Inter Milan and Fulham.
He managed Finland, United Arab Emirates and Switzerland – the latter being his most successful. He led the Swiss national side to the Round of 16 of the 1994 World Cup in the US and followed this up by qualification to Euro ’96 in England. Before Hodgson’s tenure, Switzerland had not qualified for a major international tournament since the 1966 World Cup.
Of course, it would be wrong to compare these jobs to the size and pressure associated with the England job. However, it is clear that Hodgson understands international football and what is needed for success. His qualification record underlines this.
Like you say in your last paragraph, the magnitude of the England job and the pressure that comes with it is something he's unlikely to have experienced before - maybe at Inter or Liverpool, but nowhere else - but being that his best achievements are winning the Swedish & Danish leagues, I just think we should be looking at better managers.
Also, the World Cup was a fucking shambles and nobody can argue otherwise. I have no idea how he kept his job after that.
Obviously I'd love for us to win the Euros. I think even getting to the semis would be brilliant, but if that happens it will be in spite of the fact that Hodgson is the manager, not because of him.