SWP's back
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Jun 2009
- Messages
- 89,069
Very true and only a small point but the air support used rockets and not missiles.I've been reading a lot of WW2 books recently and its striking how similar the significant issues are. In fact you could argue that the fighting in Normandy by the allies was more sophisticated.
In 1944 the allies had massive air superiority and they were working on tactics to better use this to their advantage. They eventually developed a system called the taxi rank. The tank crews would have a pilot / navigator join them in the tank and they put them on the radio. Tanks then became more of a reconnaissance roll - they would push forward untill they came under fire. Then they pulled back and called in the dive bombers. They would fire coloured smoke at the enemy position to mark them. The call for the fighter bombers would be relayed back but once close enough the tank would speak directly to the pilot giving them very detailed instructions. By this point they even had missiles so the accuracy of the air to ground was almost as good as today.
What they didn't have to face was smart air defence weapons. That is the game changer and why in some ways this fighting is more primitive. The Russians dont seem willing to use air superiority as the weaponry available to the ukranians will do significant damage. So its very much a ground war with the old issues of logistics and holding large areas by putting boots on the ground and then supplying that massive area with fuel / food / ammo. That was the issue in WW2 and where the Germans eventually lost essentially due to lack of supply reaching the fronts.