Russian invasion of Ukraine

what a surprise.

Actually, it isn't.

Just another lie by the Russians.

Russia denies railway station strike​

Russia has denied involvement in the strikes on the railway station in Kramatorsk.

The country's defence ministry said accusations that Russia had attacked the station were "a provocation" and "absolutely untrue".

As evidence has emerged in recent days of other attacks against civilians elsewhere in Ukraine, Moscow has offered similar denials.
 
I don't get this???



What appears to be a section of a missile has been pictured by Sky News near Kramatorsk Station.

As mentioned earlier, there has been some focus on writing inscribed on the side of the missile.

The writing is Russian and the words translate to "for" and "children".

However, Sky News translators have identified what appears to be an important point around the grammatical formulation of the inscribed text.

They say the way "for" has been written means the translation from Russian is "for what has been done to the children".
 
I don't get this???



What appears to be a section of a missile has been pictured by Sky News near Kramatorsk Station.

As mentioned earlier, there has been some focus on writing inscribed on the side of the missile.

The writing is Russian and the words translate to "for" and "children".

However, Sky News translators have identified what appears to be an important point around the grammatical formulation of the inscribed text.

They say the way "for" has been written means the translation from Russian is "for what has been done to the children".
Allegedly for the benefit of Russia's children?
 
I don't get this???



What appears to be a section of a missile has been pictured by Sky News near Kramatorsk Station.

As mentioned earlier, there has been some focus on writing inscribed on the side of the missile.

The writing is Russian and the words translate to "for" and "children".

However, Sky News translators have identified what appears to be an important point around the grammatical formulation of the inscribed text.

They say the way "for" has been written means the translation from Russian is "for what has been done to the children".
I think what’s inside the projectile was more important than anything inscribed on its casing. It was a lethal weapon targeted at a civilian location which did what it was intended to do. Heinous.
 
I don't get this???



What appears to be a section of a missile has been pictured by Sky News near Kramatorsk Station.

As mentioned earlier, there has been some focus on writing inscribed on the side of the missile.

The writing is Russian and the words translate to "for" and "children".

However, Sky News translators have identified what appears to be an important point around the grammatical formulation of the inscribed text.

They say the way "for" has been written means the translation from Russian is "for what has been done to the children".
"Sky News Translators"?

Surprised it didn't translate to "from the Etihad".
 
What I'm about to post is mad, and it would mean our deaths, but I would welcome a 3rd World War, and possibly a final 1, to kill this fucker. If he does survive and hides in his nuclear shelter for the remainder if his life, he'll have no army left, he'll have nothing to be President of, and he will go down in history as the animal who destroyed mankind.
Yep you're right, you are mad.
 
I don't get this???



What appears to be a section of a missile has been pictured by Sky News near Kramatorsk Station.

As mentioned earlier, there has been some focus on writing inscribed on the side of the missile.

The writing is Russian and the words translate to "for" and "children".

However, Sky News translators have identified what appears to be an important point around the grammatical formulation of the inscribed text.

They say the way "for" has been written means the translation from Russian is "for what has been done to the children".

I think they think they're doing it to protect their own children from the evil Ukrainian Nazis.
 
What I'm about to post is mad, and it would mean our deaths, but I would welcome a 3rd World War, and possibly a final 1, to kill this fucker. If he does survive and hides in his nuclear shelter for the remainder if his life, he'll have no army left, he'll have nothing to be President of, and he will go down in history as the animal who destroyed mankind.
Don't think he has the bottle to do it, nuclear option is a wipe out of his precious Russian empire also, I suspect the weasel faced child murdering **** is more into his chemicals so he can easily blame it on Ukraine, even he realises nobody will give a shit as to whose fault it is if a nuclear war happened - kind of irrelevant.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.