flook
Well-Known Member
I meant us as the aggressor in terms of triggering a NATO response, ie in the scenario I stated it wouldn't. I think we agree :)The UK attacking invading Russian forces in either of Sweden or Finland’s territory won’t be us being the aggressor or trigger a NATO response should Russia attack our forces in either Sweden or Finland territory. Should Russia attack the UK then it would trigger a collective NATO response.
Whilst I think it’s absolutely the right thing to do to support Finland and Sweden during their full transition in to NATO I do wonder if this guarantee is more likely to encourage some limited Russian aggression against Finland or Sweden to provoke a limited response from UK and have a better narrative in Russia for that **** Putin.
Your second paragraph is also along the lines of what I was thinking, if he does intend aggression towards Finland or Sweden, it's likely to happen before they join NATO, which potentially leaves us on our own in having pledged support