So be it.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Russian invasion of Ukraine
- Thread starter feedmpenzaandhewillscore
- Start date
So be it.
metalblue
Well-Known Member
Got to be hard lined. Russia’s economy is not varied, and can quickly and easily have a foot put on its neck.
I also think it’s time for the West to expel Russians from their countries, sons and daughters of oligarchs at our schools and unis, investors who launder money through British businesses, close down certain investments even if it means losing money.
I don’t think it’s quick but otherwise agreed, especially about sending their kids home from uni and schools. Got to get them on a personal level and that is something that can be done by the weekend.
All down the length and breadth of Europe the café vlogging cappuccino drinkers will be trying to sort out a doctors appointment so they can get an exemption certificate from conscription.
Yeah, I'm sure that would never have happened back in the day.
Although didn't 13 million of the 25 million eligible for the Vietnam draft defer it, and a million criminally evade it?
East Level 2
Well-Known Member
The So be it Union?So be it.
Did you really just say that
Reportedly being arrested the minute any sign of protest is evident.
So be it.
It's not like I'm owed any of it, Im just saying politically it might be harder to get through than we hoped.
Protein Junkie
Well-Known Member
For as long as I can remember we have had MAD theory.Is WW3 all that infeasible? Do Russia (and China), deep down, want WW3 to establish a new world order?
Russia (and China) has been taking the piss for 15 years, with little repercussions. I’m not sure the threats off the back of invading further worries them.
Is the threat of all our nuclear arsenals just that - a threat - and would never actually be used? Therefore meaning WW3 could easily come about in ground and air forces, and medium range ballistics. Rather than nuclear war and a few keys and big red buttons?
It is entirely plausible a WW3 could occur without use of Nuclear Weapons. There is no guarantee either way.
The big “what if” is if either side is on the verge of a defeat. Then we could see MAD.
Whether any human in this planet is willing to risk is another matter. Any legacy, Motherland or Western Democracy becomes utterly irrelevant.
D
D
Deleted member 77198
Guest
Post of the thread!The So be it Union?
GaudinoMotors
Well-Known Member
The Germans built a fair few in that time too.We’d have lost the Battle of Britain if we’d have gone to war a year earlier. We had fuck all fighter aircraft in 1938 but built over 1,000 between 1938 and the summer of 1940 and each and every one was needed.
Elbow beards
Well-Known Member
Turn Stamford bridge into a big internment camp.I don’t think it’s quick but otherwise agreed, especially about sending their kids home from uni and schools. Got to get them on a personal level and that is something that can be done by the weekend.