Russian invasion of Ukraine

mosssideblue said:
Putin has obviously told his lackey to force Ukraine into ending the war on current front line borders.

Hope Zelensky gets the backing of Europe and others to decline such a ridiculous idea
Click to expand...
From what i can gather.
Putin has told Trump he'd be willing to exchange the occupied parts of Kherson and Zaporizhzhia Regions,for full control of Donetsk and Luhansk Regions.

Heroyam Slava.
 
SPIDERBOY said:
From what i can gather.
Putin has told Trump he'd be willing to exchange the occupied parts of Kherson and Zaporizhzhia Regions,for full control of Donetsk and Luhansk Regions.

Heroyam Slava.
Click to expand...
I’m not sure that even the Russian speakers in the east will be overjoyed at that prospect.
 
grunge said:
Yes in sufficient numbers. As could the storm shadow and flamingo’s as well as the guided bombs dropped from F16’s if they are willing to risk the planes.

At this point I don’t believe personally that the bridge is still there though lack of means but is intentional.
Click to expand...

Just read this that goes into some detail about your last paragraph.

themilitaryanalyst.com

THE CRIMEA GAMBIT: UKRAINE’S STRATEGY FOR ITS RETURN

Ukraine has carried out a successful war against the Russians across Crimea, effectively neutralizing it as an operating military resource and attritting countless russian weapons and EW/radar syst…
themilitaryanalyst.com themilitaryanalyst.com

Crimea is all but neutralised and it costs russia so much money in military hardware trying to rearm it.
 
.
roubaixtuesday said:
Strong disagree.

Ukraine has tried, what, three times to take it down and failed?

Speaks volumes on both intent and capability.
Click to expand...

2 attempts on the road bridge and the 3rd didn’t seem like much of an attempt. But it did have the necessary reaction. Russia no longer use it to transport fuel or military hardware. So it’s exactly what it needs to be. A way off Crimea for the Russian who set up there. So taking it out is really just a symbolic at this point. Although that symbol could be very important soon if things start to ramp up in Russia.

To take it out entirely it needs large bomb hits on the struts. As the panels are easier to replace. From previous reports I’d read it probably needs a couple of 1k kg payloads
 
Last edited:
grunge said:
.


2 attempts on the road bridge and the 3rd didn’t seem like much of an attempt. But it did have the necessary reaction. Russia no longer use it to transport fuel or military hardware. So it’s exactly what it needs to be. A way off Crimea for the Russian who set up there. So taking it out is really just a symbolic at this point. Although that symbol could be very important soon if things start to ramp up in Russia.

To take it out entirely it needs large bomb hits on the struts. As the panels are easier to replace. From previous reports I’d read it probably needs a couple of 1k kg payloads
Click to expand...
1 attempt was by Partisan,not AFU.
Think the 2 times by the AFU was just a "we can hit it if/when we want to".
Maybe a warning to Putin,maybe a test to see what damage which weapons can do?
Personally,i still want it dropped,just for the sake of it.
It's still standing for a reason...fuck knows what.

Slava Ukraini.
 
SPIDERBOY said:
1 attempt was by Partisan,not AFU.
Think the 2 times by the AFU was just a "we can hit it if/when we want to".
Maybe a warning to Putin,maybe a test to see what damage which weapons can do?
Personally,i still want it dropped,just for the sake of it.
It's still standing for a reason...fuck knows what.

Slava Ukraini.
Click to expand...
Think of all the air defences and personnel that's tied up protecting it
 
United States for Russia



Europe should rethink the US weaponry buyout and consider focus on their own in house production. To massive scale.

And if traitors like Hungary or Slovakia, or Putin lapdogs like Serbia can try to screw Europe, europeans should be together stronger since Russia is likely to use it as a chance to strike too.
 
Blue_Lightsaber said:
United States for Russia



Europe should rethink the US weaponry buyout and consider focus on their own in house production. To massive scale.

And if traitors like Hungary or Slovakia, or Putin lapdogs like Serbia can try to screw Europe, europeans should be together stronger since Russia is likely to use it as a chance to strike too.
Click to expand...

Does the US have power of veto via the G7?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top