From "The Analyst":
BAD NEWS FOR RUSSIA
Due to flooding in Orsk, the Voronezh-M strategic missile attack warning system station has ceased operations, according to a public page "VChK-OGPU."
The station, located near the village of Kumak, 20 km from the old city, is facing a high risk of flooding due to breaches in the dams.
Why should this matter?
As a result of the shutdown, tracking launches of intercontinental ballistic missiles in the southern direction has become problematic. This is one of the few effective early warning systems the Russians have, principally designed to detect SLBM launches from the Indian Ocean area. Their space based satellites are notoriously unreliable and their ability to correctly ascertain if a nuclear attack is under way has long been limited and less than ideal.
Russia has a terrible history of false alarms and bearing in mind that both the US and Russia sit on world ending stockpiles of weapons and both use launch on warning of attack, knowing with confidence that an attacks is real is something of a big deal.
If the radar station is permanently flooded, it will be challenging to quickly restore the radars capabilities, with estimates suggesting it could take several years to rectify the situation.
The United States redirected thousands of weapons to Ukraine earlier this month, that it seized from an Iranian group attempting to smuggle the munitions to Yemen’s Houthi militants.
More than 5,000 AK-47 rifles, machine guns, sniper rifles and rocket launchers, as well as more than 500,000 rounds of 7.62mm ammunition, were transferred to the Ukrainian armed forces on April 4, according to CENTCOM.
What a delicious irony that these weapons, largely supplied to Iran by Russia have found their way home. After everything the Iranians have been responsible for against Ukraine and their lies over their alliance with Russia, it’s just a small but poetic piece of justice.
In another even more shocking diplomatic and political twist to how Russian aggression has affected European nations, the Swiss Federal President announced in her speech yesterday that, in the event of any attack on Switzerland which has just joined the wartime air defence alliance with neutral Austria, that Switzerland would work with and assist NATO. ‘An attack on us would mean we were no longer neutral and would act accordingly’ were the gist of her words.
For Switzerland this is an earthquake in its public stance on neutrality. And yet extraordinary as it may seem, inside Switzerland where once such pronouncements would have been seen as sacrilege, it’s caused hardly a stir. Yes the country would have to be attacked, but even so it’s the fact that they know who the enemy is and that they’re willing to cooperate with NATO, that’s a huge change in public perception. Austria has been neutral since the end of the post WW2 occupation in 1955. It was part of the deal when the Russian forces withdrew from Vienna. Yet it’s long been understood in the event of a war it would fight with the West if attacked. After Sweden and Finland joined NATO many thought Austria would too, but Vienna has held on to its neutral status - many international organisations are based there that require a neutral state to feel safe in. And it has an extremely right wing tilt to its politics in recent years that has less of a problem with certain governments that is perhaps ideal.