mosssideblue
Well-Known Member
Seen as you are obviously close to Putin, would you be willing to share what his objectives actually are exactly
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Russian invasion of Ukraine
- Thread starter feedmpenzaandhewillscore
- Start date
What's the objective currently then?Because....and wait for it....drum roll....that was never his objective. Get it now.
If it was he'd not only be marching through Kiev but probably London too.
St.Pauli support
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 17 Feb 2010
- Messages
- 4,815
Another truth is, putin has broken basic international law.The truth is we wouldn't need NATO if it wasn't for Russia. (NATO is a defensive alliance)
China is a fairly recent threat...
He thought the law of the jungle is on his side, now he's watching the slow liberal west scaling up defence industries funded by much bigger state budgets. His equation is going down the drain the longer he refuses to fuck off - and he very well knows.
That's the fuckin truth.
But ok @Pappa P , here's a deal:
UKR get back all their nukes (Budapest you know...) and in return UKR won't join NATO.
Job done.
kaz7
Well-Known Member
Fuck sake , polluting another thread as well, lolNATO defensive. Haha
That's the normal rate. Heavy wounded are left in the field by the Russians. I would assume the death/injury rate is more like 50% if not even worse.Only about 1/3 are dead. The rest have been badly injured.
Plus Ukr also get back:Another truth is, putin has broken basic international law.
He thought the law of the jungle is on his side, now he's watching the slow liberal west scaling up defence industries funded by much bigger state budgets. His equation is going down the drain the longer he refuses to fuck off - and he very well knows.
That's the fuckin truth.
But ok @Pappa P , here's a deal:
UKR get back all their nukes (Budapest you know...) and in return UKR won't join NATO.
Job done.
Crimea - illegally annexed in 2014 by… Russia.
Donbas region land seized - civil war sponsored by… russia
Strategic bombers, ( maybe a few B-1’s) to replace the ones they gave up, in that treaty guaranteeing their borders and not joining NATO, with… Russia.
Return of all vessels seized in illegal annexation of crimea by… Russia.
Wow.. it’s almost as though the Putin pappa patsy, has missed off the real history of the causes of this limited military action… by Russia.
For Ukraine not to enter NATO and for NATO to not place military facilities on Russia's border.Seen as you are obviously close to Putin, would you be willing to share what his objectives actually are exactly
Pretty much as was agreed and that which NATO decided to ignore. Seems incredibly reasonable, I don't think we'd like China parking up in Scotland.
grunge
Well-Known Member
For Ukraine not to enter NATO and for NATO to not place military facilities on Russia's border.
Pretty much as was agreed and that which NATO decided to ignore. Seems incredibly reasonable, I don't think we'd like China parking up in Scotland.
No agreement was made and countries shouldn’t be dictated to as to what treaties they want to join.
Russia did however sign a treaty saying they would defend Ukraine’s borders. A treaty they broke.
If Russia wasn’t a threat then countries wouldn’t be wanting to join NATO. Quite simple really.
Every now and then these Communist, Woke hell hole threads need a good sprinkling of truth and reality, just so those scrolling through who are not indoctrinated with leftist lunacy don't feel like they're going mad.Fuck sake , polluting another thread as well, lol
mosssideblue
Well-Known Member
And why does Putin have any right to say who and who cannot join NATOFor Ukraine not to enter NATO and for NATO to not place military facilities on Russia's border.
Pretty much as was agreed and that which NATO decided to ignore. Seems incredibly reasonable, I don't think we'd like China parking up in Scotland.