Russian invasion of Ukraine

Oh, the nonce is at it again. 'lifting missile restrictions will put nato at war with russia'
Ye, ye what ever, we should turn round and tell him this is pay back for using a nerve agent on British soil.
****.
Personally, I’d go in and kick the fuckers arse if he wants to take it further. And that’s our stance.
 
Oh, the nonce is at it again. 'lifting missile restrictions will put nato at war with russia'
Ye, ye what ever, we should turn round and tell him this is pay back for using a nerve agent on British soil.
****.
I have nothing but contempt for anyone British who tries to apportion blame away from Putin after what that **** did on our soil. Anyone who does that has zero self-respect.
 
Oh, the nonce is at it again. 'lifting missile restrictions will put nato at war with russia'
Ye, ye what ever, we should turn round and tell him this is pay back for using a nerve agent on British soil.
****.
And polonium 210, that was a favorite "poison" that they freely threw around London.
 
If this is right then it would certainly be an escalation of NATO involvement. From a military perspective it is absolutely the right thing to do.


Speaking earlier in the day, Putin said: “This isn’t about allowing or banning the Kyiv regime from striking Russian territory. It does that already with drones and by other means.

"But when we talk about high-precision, long-range weapons made in the West this is a completely different matter... The Ukrainian army is not able to strike with modern, high-precision, long-range systems. It can’t do this.

"It is only possible with intelligence data from satellites that Ukraine doesn’t have, data that’s only from satellites of the European Union, the USA, Nato satellites."

"The key point," he added, "is that only servicemen of Nato countries can input flight missions into these missile systems. Ukrainian servicemen cannot do this. Therefore this is not about permitting or not permitting the Ukrainian regime to strike Russia with these weapons.

"This is about whether or not Nato countries take the decision to directly participate in the military conflict.”


 
If this is right then it would certainly be an escalation of NATO involvement. From a military perspective it is absolutely the right thing to do.


Speaking earlier in the day, Putin said: “This isn’t about allowing or banning the Kyiv regime from striking Russian territory. It does that already with drones and by other means.

"But when we talk about high-precision, long-range weapons made in the West this is a completely different matter... The Ukrainian army is not able to strike with modern, high-precision, long-range systems. It can’t do this.

"It is only possible with intelligence data from satellites that Ukraine doesn’t have, data that’s only from satellites of the European Union, the USA, Nato satellites."

"The key point," he added, "is that only servicemen of Nato countries can input flight missions into these missile systems. Ukrainian servicemen cannot do this. Therefore this is not about permitting or not permitting the Ukrainian regime to strike Russia with these weapons.

"This is about whether or not Nato countries take the decision to directly participate in the military conflict.”


As I said before, this coming from a man who's direct actions had caused a British citizen to die on British soil, that in itself was an act of war.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.