tommybooth
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 23 Nov 2008
- Messages
- 5,313
eeerrrrrrrrrrr
I've watched lots of his minutes and knew he signed in February unlike you who thought he signed in the summer. I've also watched him play plenty of times for City. I've certainly not seen a 40-50m player in those minutes. As you said he signed in the summer i assumed you thought we'd sold him to Villa and he was 5 times that value not 5 times the fee Villa paid which is anything from £8m up to £15m inc add ons depending on which report you read.You don’t actually watch Villa ever do you?
For a start he arrived at the end of January, with 15 league games left and he played 11 of them, starting 9 of the last 10 he was fit for.
He also started all 4 of their knockout games in Europe.
Good player yes, my point was he isn't anywhere near a 50m player.He looks like a decent player to me , not saying he would get in are first 11 mind
He looks better than Kalvin, so there could be an argument made… ;-)Good player yes, my point was he isn't anywhere near a 50m player.
Hard to say as no one has seen him play in over a year, but I think my original point stands. He’s not really got a position. He’s not a good enough defender to be a full back and not productive enough to be a winger.What has happened to him ? Was the next big thing. Would he be good enough to be back up left back if we get in a proper left back and sold Gomez ? Don’t suppose Pep will want to left back mind given the current formation and as a still relatively young player he will want to play
Thread ban incoming ;-)Free transfer, can provide cover for the LB position. Offer him 200k per week, and see if that tempts him. Get on the case Txiki, you know it makes sense.
;-)