Prestwich_Blue said:And that's the puzzle isn't it.dennishasdoneit said:Prestwich_Blue said:You can use that argument if it's one or two being disruptive but when you've alienated virtually all your first team squad, many of your coaching and backroom staff, the former doctor, the former and current DoF, the CEO, the Head of Communications and quite possibly the owner as well then you might have to accept you're the problem.
i take your point.
But none of that seemed to matter when, last month we went to utd and out played them on their own ground.
4 days later we out play chelsea at wembley.
whatever mancini was doing behind the scenes didn,t appear to be affecting the quality of our performances on the pitch.
I think it's the puzzle that has been answered throughout the season.
Players could motivate themselves for those games- and their class shone through.
A lot of the games, particularly earlier in the season, we weren't firing on all cylinders, or fully motivated, but the superior class of our players enabled us to grind out victories.
Too many games, we just weren't motivated enough for the 'smaller' teams.
If that was Mancini's fault, then fine. It appears it probably was. What cannot be argued, is that he didn't get the best out of the team this season, apart from a handful of games.
As many have said, it's happened, so no point in dwelling on it.
From what his former players have had to say about him, Pellegrini appears to be everything Mancini was not in terms of man management, and hopefully we will see a different City this season.