Sagna fined 40K for social media post.

Carlos, you don't compare it, I dont think it's the same eirher. I just said he may get a ban, I think it's a possibility. The FA judge things on and off the pitch that are brought to their attention. Ie media driven, agueros elbow was played over and over again by all of them and hey presto a review and ban. Ibrahimovich s more blatant elbow on Otamendi didn't get played at all in the media, very little attention apart from complaints by City fans , it got reviewed by that clown Clattenburg who deemed it accidental even tho Ibrahimovich was looking at otamendi ! It's trial by media even if it isn't a conspiracy. A shit system.
 
Churchlawtonblue said:
Gray got a four game ban for posts he put on social media four years ago.
Click to expand...
Andre Gray got a 4 match suspension for saying gay people should be burned to death, Sagna has posted something that could possibly be interpreted, if you believe the referee was unreasonably harsh on his team, to be an implication that the referee wasn't impartial.

Cop the fuck on.
 
Churchlawtonblue said:
Carlos, you don't compare it, I dont think it's the same eirher. I just said he may get a ban, I think it's a possibility. The FA judge things on and off the pitch that are brought to their attention. Ie media driven, agueros elbow was played over and over again by all of them and hey presto a review and ban. Ibrahimovich s more blatant elbow on Otamendi didn't get played at all in the media, very little attention apart from complaints by City fans , it got reviewed by that clown Clattenburg who deemed it accidental even tho Ibrahimovich was looking at otamendi ! It's trial by media even if it isn't a conspiracy. A shit system.
Click to expand...
Can't argue with any of that pal.
And Bournemouth have just made it 3-0 against Arsenal!
 
Churchlawtonblue said:
I hope not, but the FA and referees are duplicitous. Questioning the impartially of match officials is against the rules simple as. Posts on social media are not always dealt with by fines. Gray got a four game ban for posts he put on social media four years ago. Mason may also change his match report about the little kick sagna gave boyd ,like Marriner did saying he didn't see Agueeos elbow and low and behold a ban for sagna. All I am saying is there have got to be better ways of expressing our disgust at the reffereeing decisions we have been on the end of. That's all.
Click to expand...
He booked Sagna, he can hardly say he didn't see it
 
Last edited:
Churchlawtonblue said:
Why do you say that? Clearly Mason had a poor game. But why put out comments on social media that will only end up inflicting further harm on our club. Sagna may well get a four game ban for that post. Is that a good idea? If you think so then perhaps we should all get t shirts printed with 10 vs 12 on them and the players warm up in them before west ham. Would make a good point no doubt but would result in a massive fine and more suspensions. What do you think? I think we have to be more clever than that. Get some media on side use ex players. But also the right channels. The club should have put a complaint in and asked for an explanation of Taylor's performance. But as far as I can tell we did nothing.
Click to expand...
And where do you think a complaint from the club would help or get us? It will immediately be leaked by senior officials within the corrupt system - an obvious name springs to mind - and then the media knives will be out AGAIN. As for getting "some media on side", who do you suggest? There may be individual "journalists" who may be impartial, but do you seriously believe that the their editors would fly in the face of what the non - City supporting public would enjoy reading?

As for Mason having a poor game, it was a pretty average one for him, as he's just the same whenever he turns up to referee us. And why would Sagna get a 4 game ban? For what? Stating the truth? The standard of refereeing is at an all - time low, and it appears to me that it is not even subtle anymore what they are trying to do. From the top downwards the system is corrupt, pushed by the vested interests and greed of those who control the game.
 
A lot of players don't even tweet themselves and their account is handled by a PR person. Just tell the FA that he didn't write it. I can't see how they could prove otherwise.
 
aguero93:20 said:
Andre Gray got a 4 match suspension for saying gay people should be burned to death, Sagna has posted something that could possibly be interpreted, if you believe the referee was unreasonably harsh on his team, to be an implication that the referee wasn't impartial.

Cop the fuck on.
Click to expand...
Just an opinion that I don't think it helps That's all. The FA interpret things as they see fit. If you think it helps that's your opinion? All I said was he may get a four game ban for a post born out of frustration. I hope not.
 
Churchlawtonblue said:
Just an opinion that I don't think it helps That's all. The FA interpret things as they see fit. If you think it helps that's your opinion? All I said was he may get a four game ban for a post born out of frustration. I hope not.
Click to expand...
He can't, the most he'll get is a one game ban, anything else would be disproportionate and unprecedented and could be appealed to CAS. Precedent there would suggest a successful appeal.
 
Churchlawtonblue said:
Just an opinion that I don't think it helps That's all. The FA interpret things as they see fit. If you think it helps that's your opinion? All I said was he may get a four game ban for a post born out of frustration. I hope not.
Click to expand...
And why would they be able to say it was frustration when we won the game?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.