Sagna fined 40K for social media post.

[yeseye]

Probably give Burnley the 3points for good measure.

 

[Colin Bells Boots]

Probably right,the FA are a touchy bunch at the best of times,to charge him for this is ridiculous,they must know everyone thinks the refs are bent

They fucking should do - they appoint them for games despite their " performances ".

 

[aguero93:20]

Whip round to pay his fine and a fan statement calling Mason a cheating ****? Can't charge the fans.

 

[Don Karleone]

The FA are more worried about what someone says on social media than the standard of refereeing today.

Fuckwits

 

[Colin Bells Boots]

The FA are bent bastards , it's pretty much censorship.

Corrected for accuracy .

 

[remember arthur mann]

Our discipline has been awful this season,i don't know what the fuck is going on

Sorry Kaz, just jumping on the bandwagon, LOL !!

 

[hertsblue]

The Football Association allege that the defender's post, which was later deleted, "questioned the integrity of the match official".

There is no question, the ref was corrupt for everyone to see

 

[Bewar3them00n]

It's a vague post, not as if he'd said the "FA where bunch of corrupt fuckwits, and Lee Mason has taken a backhander"
A fine and a warning would suffice, it's not like we haven't had enough bans lately..

 

[chaddblue]

If he had said that to the ref during the game what would have happened?

A bollocking or a yellow card at worst

So they can hardly justify a ban just cos he wrote it rather than said it

 

[BigOscar]

I do like the way the FA never investigates the performance of officials, but clamps down on any suggestion that it's less than perfect. It's almost as if referees are free to do what they want (or are told) without any fear of scrutiny...