You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Sagna signing confirmed (page 109)
- Thread starter Daz_Blue
- Start date
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
sir baconface
Well-Known Member
Re: Sagna
A load of balderdash on here about Sagna's hair.
Pair him with Demichelis, with Joe providing product advice, and we will be undisputed tonsorial champions, 2015.
A load of balderdash on here about Sagna's hair.
Pair him with Demichelis, with Joe providing product advice, and we will be undisputed tonsorial champions, 2015.
mscenterh750
Well-Known Member
Re: Sagna
Let utd have the fucker.
Let utd have the fucker.
chris85mcfc
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 28 Jun 2013
- Messages
- 5,740
Re: Sagna
Saw him in Marbella last year and he stopped to talk to a lucky lucky man on the street
Seemed like a really good lad
His mrs is firing as well
Saw him in Marbella last year and he stopped to talk to a lucky lucky man on the street
Seemed like a really good lad
His mrs is firing as well
Re: Sagna
We could do with a few baldies though.
sir baconface said:A load of balderdash on here about Sagna's hair.
Pair him with Demichelis, with Joe providing product advice, and we will be undisputed tonsorial champions, 2015.
We could do with a few baldies though.
BlueMo'
Well-Known Member
Re: Sagna
He could just about cope with Mancinis set up, even then he fucked up or got bailed out by Vinny on numerous occasions.
In Pellegrinis team he's fucked. He gets drawn to ball and hasn't a clue where he is or what's happening elsewhere.
He has no anticipation or awareness of the whole picture. He was great in Pearces team. We've moved on a bit.
El Mago said:LoveCity said:ca. £100,000/week over 3 years and a free transfer = £14m
An equivalent player of a younger age = ca. £15m-£20m transfer fee + ca. £14m in wages (over 3 years) = £30m or more
City's strategy looks to be clear in some positions (see what the academy produces, if nothing then buy a young player when needed), but some people just can't seem to think outside the box.
Outside the box there is me thinking that Micah Richards can't have a worse luck with injuries than this season and he is good enough to be a back RB.
He played key role when we won the league in 2011/2012
He is homegrown, younger, and on less wages than Sagna.
He could just about cope with Mancinis set up, even then he fucked up or got bailed out by Vinny on numerous occasions.
In Pellegrinis team he's fucked. He gets drawn to ball and hasn't a clue where he is or what's happening elsewhere.
He has no anticipation or awareness of the whole picture. He was great in Pearces team. We've moved on a bit.
kun
Well-Known Member
Re: Sagna
Where are Danny Mills and Laurent Charvet nowadays?Ray78 said:sir baconface said:A load of balderdash on here about Sagna's hair.
Pair him with Demichelis, with Joe providing product advice, and we will be undisputed tonsorial champions, 2015.
We could do with a few baldies though.
hihosilva
Well-Known Member
Re: Sagna
There is a better option who goes by the name of Micah Richards.
He's not as good a defender as Sagna but as a threat going forward he is much better. Micah just needs to sign a new contract,have an injury free season & get back to his best form.
Tron Coltrane said:Hihosilva said:He's just not good enough for us
Not trying to be adversarial here, even though I completely disagree, but who would you have us sign? Is that person going to be content with playing second fiddle to Zabba? And how much will they cost us?
I'm open to the idea there are better options than Sagna, I'm just stuck trying to think of one. Top 5 RB in the league this season and available for free.
There is a better option who goes by the name of Micah Richards.
He's not as good a defender as Sagna but as a threat going forward he is much better. Micah just needs to sign a new contract,have an injury free season & get back to his best form.
Re: Sagna
An injury free season is a huge ask and when he did play this season he showed a lack of awareness with his forward runs.
Hihosilva said:Tron Coltrane said:Hihosilva said:He's just not good enough for us
Not trying to be adversarial here, even though I completely disagree, but who would you have us sign? Is that person going to be content with playing second fiddle to Zabba? And how much will they cost us?
I'm open to the idea there are better options than Sagna, I'm just stuck trying to think of one. Top 5 RB in the league this season and available for free.
There is a better option who goes by the name of Micah Richards.
He's not as good a defender as Sagna but as a threat going forward he is much better. Micah just needs to sign a new contract,have an injury free season & get back to his best form.
An injury free season is a huge ask and when he did play this season he showed a lack of awareness with his forward runs.
hihosilva
Well-Known Member
Re: Sagna
If you talking about his defensive awareness when he makes his forward runs then it's down to one of the holding midfielders to sit in & cover.
mcfc482 said:Hihosilva said:Tron Coltrane said:Not trying to be adversarial here, even though I completely disagree, but who would you have us sign? Is that person going to be content with playing second fiddle to Zabba? And how much will they cost us?
I'm open to the idea there are better options than Sagna, I'm just stuck trying to think of one. Top 5 RB in the league this season and available for free.
There is a better option who goes by the name of Micah Richards.
He's not as good a defender as Sagna but as a threat going forward he is much better. Micah just needs to sign a new contract,have an injury free season & get back to his best form.
An injury free season is a huge ask and when he did play this season he showed a lack of awareness with his forward runs.
If you talking about his defensive awareness when he makes his forward runs then it's down to one of the holding midfielders to sit in & cover.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.