Samir Nasri

[taconinja]

Re: Nasri

You made it up, mate. Funny.

I might make my own up. We "nasri" the ball a bit too much, ie, put our foot on it, take three touches, spin 90 degrees and pass it back to a holding midfielder.

There's far too much nasriing of the ball going on in the current City team.

It's called transformational-generative grammar. Stop acting like a twit and address the point if you disagree instead of your usual little sideshow of sneering at people hoping everyone doesn't notice you aren't making an actual point.

 

[Didsbury Dave]

Re: Nasri

You made it up, mate. Funny.

I might make my own up. We "nasri" the ball a bit too much, ie, put our foot on it, take three touches, spin 90 degrees and pass it back to a holding midfielder.

There's far too much nasriing of the ball going on in the current City team.

It's called transformational-generative grammar. Stop acting like a twit and address the point if you disagree instead of your usual little sideshow of sneering at people hoping everyone doesn't notice you aren't making an actual point.

No. It's called fabrication.

I have made my points about Nasri, and why he makes us a worse team, several times in this thread. Want me to cycle them for you?

 

[taconinja]

Re: Nasri

You made it up, mate. Funny.

I might make my own up. We "nasri" the ball a bit too much, ie, put our foot on it, take three touches, spin 90 degrees and pass it back to a holding midfielder.

There's far too much nasriing of the ball going on in the current City team.

It's called transformational-generative grammar. Stop acting like a twit and address the point if you disagree instead of your usual little sideshow of sneering at people hoping everyone doesn't notice you aren't making an actual point.

No. It's called fabrication.

I have made my points about Nasri, and why he makes us a worse team, several times in this thread. Want me to cycle them for you?

Oh, you mean move through the various points in order to illustrate your point? Why yes that is cycling through them just as there is a cycle of seasons occurring in an orderly procession.

It's not a fabrication. It's a word. You just tried to make a nasty, petty dismissal because you don't have an actual argument and you're as usual too obsessed with your fragile ego to concede when you're wrong. And since you aren't going to engage on the actual issue, I'm done with you.

 

[Didsbury Dave]

Re: Nasri

It's called transformational-generative grammar. Stop acting like a twit and address the point if you disagree instead of your usual little sideshow of sneering at people hoping everyone doesn't notice you aren't making an actual point.

No. It's called fabrication.

I have made my points about Nasri, and why he makes us a worse team, several times in this thread. Want me to cycle them for you?

Oh, you mean move through the various points in order to illustrate your point? Why yes that is cycling through them just as there is a cycle of seasons occurring in an orderly procession.

It's not a fabrication. It's a word. You just tried to make a nasty, petty dismissal because you don't have an actual argument and you're as usual too obsessed with your fragile ego to concede when you're wrong. And since you aren't going to engage on the actual issue, I'm done with you.

I'm hedgehog with you too.

 

[Greg.W2]

Re: Nasri

You both make valid points. Our build up play is to slow when trying to break through 10 men behind the ball. And yes Nasri doesnt do enough, his body language was very poor on tuesday, he didnt seem to give a fuck when dragged off.

Also we are crying out for a bit of genuine width, most of the chances created against QPR were when we actualy got behind them (apart from the milner pass to Dzecko on his heels again chance) But will Mancini ever address these problems ?

 

[taconinja]

Re: Nasri

You both make valid points. Our build up play is to slow when trying to break through 10 men behind the ball. And yes Nasri doesnt do enough, his body language was very poor on tuesday, he didnt seem to give a fuck when dragged off.

Also we are crying out for a bit of genuine width, most of the chances created against QPR were when we actualy got behind them (apart from the milner pass to Dzecko on his heels again chance) But will Mancini ever address these problems ?

He had best in my opinion. The root of the problem is that we need more decisive action quicker out of central midfield although I do agree our wing play needs to be more decisive as well. If Mancini can't see that, then we aren't going to improve and he'll find himself out of a job at some point in the not-too-distant future.

 

[Heart.net]

Re: Nasri

I found this on the other site.

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.squawka.com/players/samir-nasri" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.squawka.com/players/samir-nasri</a>

 

[Akira]

Re: Nasri

Are we hating on Nasri now that Mario's gone?

 

[Any1aBlue]

Re: Nasri

Are we hating on Nasri now that Mario's gone?

No, some of us have never liked Nasri - before, or since signing for us. Dreadful bit of business. Shame Balotelli couldnt take him with him,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

 

[coleridge]

Re: Nasri

Are we hating on Nasri now that Mario's gone?

Many are and won't stop now.