I wouldnt bother, from the moment he started telling you that you were talking rubbish and asking for evidence I thought there's someone who wont change their mind.
Yeah, they're talking bollocks again.Rather indirectly connected, but there is a post on the comments section under the article about the German demise, which blames ‘the guardiola effect’!
Apparently he single-handedly ruined germany’s top club and therefore its national side by ‘buying in all foreigners and not giving young german’s (sic) a chance’ He also didn’t have any strikers there ‘because he doesn’t like forwards’, all just before the World Cup giving the Germans no time to recover.
And, in case you hadn’t spotted it- he’s now ‘doing the same at City’!
I wonder if anyone else has noticed this glaring fault?
I've read the article. You've jumped massively from "he didn't arrive good, he didn't play well" to an "attitude problem". I'm not going to base my opinions on what you've made up.
There is zero mention of attitude.
We simply started with 352. We were pretty average with it. We soon changed and the rest is history.
Your idea that if he'd had the season he'd had for us for at Bayern and he'd have not been a dead cert is frankly a lie. You know it is.
Oh yes, Brandt is playing for a much worse team, with much worse statistics, yet still got picked. You claim on work rate. Something Leroy is exceptional at, regularly commented on by pundits. I think it's because he plays in Germany.
You've jumped to your own conclusions. The fact that Sané did have a better season than any German forward, the fact that Germany clearly lacked pace, invention and the ability to beat a man would suggest they made a huge boo boo.
How's Ozil's work rate? Attitude? Better than Sané? What about Muller or Draxler?
Fact is, Sané had a much better season than Ozil, Draxler, Muller,Goretzka(played wide yesterday), Reus, Gomez. Sané was considered one of the best if not the best young forward in Europe. You think he got left out for footballing or attitude reasons. I think you're bonkers.
Sane has had a better season than the players you listed, but some of them have got a medal to back up their argument. Sane's performances for City were rewarded with him playing in friendlies and qualifiers but simply put, the Sane we've seen for City is not the Sane that has played for Germany. Löw has said it came down to a choice between Sane and Brandt, and went for Brandt based on what he had seen.
If you're saying Sane was left out for anything other than footballing reasons (ie Bayern's decision), you need to take a look in the mirror before calling people bonkers.
Sidenote, if you had to rank Aguero, Jesus, Sterling, Sane, De Bruyne, D Silva, and Fernandinho in terms of work ethic, where would you put Sane?
For me he is 6th out of 7, and I've not got 5 better superlatives to describe work rate of those ahead of him. On that basis I think you have overstated "exceptional". I would say its ok for a winger.
There is a lot of truth in that post, if you ask me. What you said about full backs providing the width made me think about how the German play has also shown how a player like Timo Werner simply is not very well suited to ball possession football. He is a counter attacking player and belongs in a team like (dare I say it) Liverpool, rather than a Pep-team. Löw also failed to get the best out or Timo Werner, in the same way as he has consistently failed to get something out of Leroy.Leroy is the victim of Low's loyalty to a group of players who have served him well over the years, who won him the world cup and whom he cannot bring himself to jettison. In addition to this we have to acknowledge Low's exceptional conservatism in matters of tactics and formation. These are the two threads which run through Low's career in the German national set up since 2006.
Last year Germany sent a young team to the Confederations Cup, won it convincingly and Low responded by filling about half his squad for Russia with players from the Confederations Cup. Sane was not included because his form for Germany was not good enough -no goals and no assists. This from a lad who shredded PL defences virtually every week. Julian Brandt was the better bet for Germany, we were told. Very telling though was the fact the Brandt was only used as a sub, totalling only 19 minutes on the pitch in 3 games! Low plays midfielders centrally and expects his "full backs"to provide the width. Hence Germany were shredded down the flanks. Leroy would have been wasted and Germany lost out massively. This is why he was not one of the Confederations Cup squad taken to Russia and Low and Germany must live with it.
Germany has paid for Low's loyalty to a group of players as well. The only player who played in the Confederations Cup to play in all 3 matches in Russia is Kimmich. Nine Confed Cup players actually got onto the pitch but only 3 played a full 90 minutes and one of them, Sule, only played at all because Boateng was suspended. The others either started but were replaced by players Low had trusted for years when things weren't going well or were thrown on late in a desperate attempt to salvage a result. Apart from that Low stuck with the same old gang: Neuer, Boateng, Kroos, Muller, Reus, Gomez, Hummels, Khedira and, of course, Ozil. How many have shown good form over the last year? How many have struggled with injury? Six of them played in Germany's defeat to Spain in the semi-final of the 2010 world cup and six (only Kroos was a newcomer) played in the final of 2014. Of the other 5 2014 finalists Low had to replace 3 because of retirement. He seems to change nothing if its an option, most Germans are not surprised by their elimination and how did he not sense that many of his trusted circle are no longer good enough. Our lad is but not with a manager like Joachim Low.