Sarah Everard murder | Wayne Couzens given whole-life sentence

Surely, one or more of his colleagues at the police station must have had some concerns over the man's behaviour or attituded? Perhaps out of a misguided sense of loyalty he/she said nothing. If that is the case then I hope that person's conscience is troubling them.
 
A thread about a monster and his horrific crime has,for the usual suspects, become an opportunity to hate on the Police......99.9% of whom are incredible people,but,hey......lets not let that fact get in the way of a good berating- Pathetic.

As for the **** himself,hopefully proper justice is quickly served.
If you mean me you need to read better
 
I guess the severity of the crime along with mistrust of power made any other sentence impossible.

If, say, Huntley had pled guilty, would his sentence have been reduced?
Credit for a guilty plea is an established principle at the court’s discretion, rather than anything arising out of statute, so it would have been up to the sentencing judge - so quite possibly not.

The problem is that if the courts stop giving credit out for guilty pleas in serious offending then defendants will start saying fuck it, I may as well have my four weeks in court and put the victim’s family through even more torture.
 
Surely, one or more of his colleagues at the police station must have had some concerns over the man's behaviour or attituded? Perhaps out of a misguided sense of loyalty he/she said nothing. If that is the case then I hope that person's conscience is troubling them.
Many have been questioning how Wayne Couzens was able to serve as a police officer despite numerous allegations against him.

Former Met Police Chief Superintendent Parm Sandhu said it was likely he had made comments or displayed inappropriate behaviour at work but people were not in a position to report it.

"If colleagues were not strong or not able to report that, that's because the sexist attitudes still exist in policing and that's right across the country," she told Sky News.

"One of the problems that you've got is if a female in particular makes an allegation against a male officer, that allegation will follow her for the rest of her career.

"If she makes the allegation and then she has to press the emergency button for help at a later date, her team may not respond because teams tend to close ranks there."

She argued policing culture doesn't allow concerns to be brought to the fore because "as far as [senior managers] are concerned, as long as the team is working they're not really concerned about what they would deem to be petty issues".

"So unless you can actually prove it, unless you're willing to go to court, and damage your own career, it's a big step to do that because you will be the one who's isolated," she said
 
Credit for a guilty plea is an established principle at the court’s discretion, rather than anything arising out of statute, so it would have been up to the sentencing judge - so quite possibly not.

The problem is that if the courts stop giving credit out for guilty pleas in serious offending then defendants will start saying fuck it, I may as well have my four weeks in court and put the victim’s family through even more torture.
It seems an interesting sentencing as they has to adapt the WLO regs a bit to allow the judge to apply it.

“Notwithstanding your guilty pleas, therefore, I have seen no evidence of genuine contrition on your part, as opposed to evident self-pity and attempts by you to avoid or minimise the proper consequences of what you have done."

It seems the judge didn’t believe his contrition. Does that negate the guilty plea or is it irrelevant legally?
 
It seems an interesting sentencing as they has to adapt the WLO regs a bit to allow the judge to apply it.

“Notwithstanding your guilty pleas, therefore, I have seen no evidence of genuine contrition on your part, as opposed to evident self-pity and attempts by you to avoid or minimise the proper consequences of what you have done."

It seems the judge didn’t believe his contrition. Does that negate the guilty plea or is it irrelevant legally?
It’s not strictly relevant as it is at the court’s discretion Whst credit to give (if any), but true remorse was the yardstick then only a small proportion of guilty pleas would end in a reduction in sentence!

I think the Judge, as the senior judiciary frequently do, has engaged in a bit of mental gymnastics/borderline intellectual dishonesty to arrive at the outcome he desired; in this case, with ample justification.
 
It’s almost as if Johnson, Patel and Dick had got together to agree what they should say today. All three of them said they had ‘no words’. Odd that.
 
No kaz, did people stop going to see a gp after Shipman? Or stop going to hospital especially with a baby after the nurse Beverkey Allitt murdered 6 children ?
There was also the nurse in Stockport murdering patients plus several others recently.
The answer is no, why some on here are now over reacting by saying it is now not safe to stop when a policeman tells you I don't know.
It was one police officer, it is horrific and I hope he dies a slow death in jail but the over reaction is crazy

They held an inquiry after the Shipman case and put in measures to stop it happening again. This was done to try and retain public confidence in the system. Procedures in the Health sector are often reviewed to see if things could be done differently or be made safer when incidents happen.

A similar inquiry into police practices after this case would and should be welcome.
 
Many have been questioning how Wayne Couzens was able to serve as a police officer despite numerous allegations against him.

Former Met Police Chief Superintendent Parm Sandhu said it was likely he had made comments or displayed inappropriate behaviour at work but people were not in a position to report it.

"If colleagues were not strong or not able to report that, that's because the sexist attitudes still exist in policing and that's right across the country," she told Sky News.

"One of the problems that you've got is if a female in particular makes an allegation against a male officer, that allegation will follow her for the rest of her career.

"If she makes the allegation and then she has to press the emergency button for help at a later date, her team may not respond because teams tend to close ranks there."

She argued policing culture doesn't allow concerns to be brought to the fore because "as far as [senior managers] are concerned, as long as the team is working they're not really concerned about what they would deem to be petty issues".

"So unless you can actually prove it, unless you're willing to go to court, and damage your own career, it's a big step to do that because you will be the one who's isolated," she said
Well of course you should actually have to prove it.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.