Schalke post match thread

Neville Kneville said:
But the only way to do that, is to make the rules simpler & the technology better.
Click to expand...
Yep. The amount of 'grey areas'* allow the ref to have far too much influence on the game.

*mostly areas where the rules are clear as day but constantly applied differently to suit the decision the referee wants to give.

I'm 100% in favour of VAR but it doesn't solve the referee problem and it needs to be more transparent with more accountability for officials.
 

" VAR decisions at Schalke v Manchester City explained

Thursday 21 February 2019

https://www.uefa.com/insideuefa/about-uefa/news/newsid=2593061.html

VAR protocol correctly applied for two penalty decisions during yesterday’s UEFA Champions League round of 16 match with emphasis put on “accuracy over speed.”

Two VAR reviews led to penalty kicks being awarded during yesterday’s UEFA Champions League match between FC Schalke 04 and Manchester City FC (2-3).

Both instances occurred during a period of approximately 10 minutes in which a technical issue experienced by the VAR technical supplier impacted the ability to deliver replay images to the pitchside referee review area.

When such a malfunction of the system occurs, the IFAB protocol allows for the VAR to describe to the referee what can be seen on the TV replay(s) but not tell him the decision that should be taken. The referee then makes a final decision based on his own perception and the information received orally from the VAR.

In regards to the first decision, the inability to access the incident replays at the pitchside review area led to a delay in reaching the correct decision to award a penalty kick for a handball offence, while the VAR orally described the situation to the referee to allow him to make a final decision, and for the referee to then provide an explanation to the two team captains to clarify the circumstances regarding the pitchside review area and the decision-making process

The second decision was also correctly made on the basis of the Laws of the Game (Law 11 – Offside) which stipulates: “if a player in an offside position is moving towards the ball with the intention of playing the ball and is fouled before playing or attempting to play the ball, or challenging an opponent for the ball, the foul is penalised as it has occurred before the offside offence”.

The images in the picture above - taken at the exact same moment from two different angles - clearly show that a foul is committed inside the box before the Schalke player could even attempt to play the ball and hence such offence must be punished with the awarding of a penalty kick.

Commenting on these two decisions, UEFA’s Chief Refereeing Officer Roberto Rosetti said: “I am pleased that even without the possibility for the referee to review the incidents with his own eyes, the excellent cooperation of the team of officials led to correct decisions being made.

“It must also be underlined that – and as is described in the VAR protocol - accuracy is always in principle more important than speed when reaching a decision. Clearly, last night’s technical issues had a big impact on the time taken to reach decisions, but we are fully aware that reducing the time factor is key to the success of VAR and we are doing our utmost to make reviews as quick and efficient as possible.

“However, what we ultimately want is correct decisions in such match-changing situations and this is what we got yesterday.”

UEFA will also be addressing the matter of the technical failure with its VAR technical supplier to ensure that such issue does not happen again in the future."
 
Neville Kneville said:
This has been my whole objection to v.a.r. from day one. Well including the time taken.

I'm all for the idea & implementation of technology to remove responsibility from the inconsistent & easily influenced morons who currently make these decisions.

But the only way to do that, is to make the rules simpler & the technology better.
Click to expand...

Re-worded handball rules to be passed next week:

https://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-s...s-to-be-passed-next-week-report-idUKKCN1QB0I6
 
aguero93:20 said:
Yep. The amount of 'grey areas'* allow the ref to have far too much influence on the game.

*mostly areas where the rules are clear as day but constantly applied differently to suit the decision the referee wants to give.

I'm 100% in favour of VAR but it doesn't solve the referee problem and it needs to be more transparent with more accountability for officials.
Click to expand...

They can spell out to these people, for example what the criteria for givinv a handball should be, quite easily.

It says 'deliberate'. So, are you certain enough, beyond reasonable doubt, that the player did it on purpose ? Nobody, could be certain of that, in Otamendi's case. Likewise, the problem with the decision against City at the weekend, izn't the fact that the ref didn't give handball as he couldn't be 'certain', the problem is some **** like last night, then giving one which is much less certain, even when using a replay. Then they have been backed, officially, by the ruling body.

So the ref at weekend, is wrong, according to UEFA. But if Otamendi's handball is a pen & the one at weekend is a pen incorrectly not given, what is the criteria for not giving a pen ?

If the only time handball is accidental, is if the player has literally no time to move his arm, put it in the fucking rules!
 
Neville Kneville said:
This has been my whole objection to v.a.r. from day one. Well including the time taken.

I'm all for the idea & implementation of technology to remove responsibility from the inconsistent & easily influenced morons who currently make these decisions.

But the only way to do that, is to make the rules simpler & the technology better.

We have already seen v.a.r. used on offside decisions here, when there's a tactical camera in the stand set up, in a better position to see it, than the camera actually used to make the decision, which is in an impossible position. But they are happy to start a crucial game, using that 'technology' rather than just say 'it won't work'.

Now we have v.a.r. used even when it is known to have malfunctioned. I recon there will be a few blind City fans who thought Otamendi didn't handle the ball, when they listened to it, but wouldn't dream of telling people they are certain about it.

The same bent, fucks who did the will of the cartel clubs to try & stitch up City, are the same ones who are driving the implementation of v.a.r. in its current form & they are handing it over to people like the guys who helped Liverpool knock City out of the Champs Lg & Mike Riley.

I don't believe that simple, consistent rules & precise technology are at the top of their agenda.

If it is the case that they really want v.a.r. to work, they could start by defining clearly what handball is & what constitutes a 'holding' or pushing foul in the penalty area

Seeing as they tested this at the World Cup & had exactly the same problems but have done absolutely nothing about it, I have no confidence that they are trying to improve decision making in football.

They just want it to appear as if they are.
Click to expand...
Spot on.

Ask yourself this: if fairness and transparency were the name of the game, why wasn't var and goal line tech introduced years ago?

The answer of course is that fairness and transparency is not the name of the game. It never has been. That's why they allowed David Gill for example to sit on the board of the FA whilst at the same time being MD of the scum. A ludicrous conflict of interest that would never in a million years be allowed in a "clean" sport.

No, var and glt have been resisted for as long as possible because Fifa, Uefa and the FA have been worried these technologies would make it more difficult for them to manipulate and influence results.

Based on the events of Wednesday, they need not have worried. Their ability to cheat seems unimpaired.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.