Scott Sinclair. WBA? Update page 25

Re: Scott Sinclair. WBA?

Making way for Bale, lol. Now if Nasri and Barry were also going, then I
could believe the bit about Bale. I think West Brom is Sinclair's destination.
 
Re: Scott Sinclair. WBA?

FantasyIreland said:
Dribble said:
Nothing against the player, but he must have been even more shocked than we were when Marwood made an approach for him

Are you blaming Marwood for his purchase?
Who said anything about blame? Marwood was widely acknowledged as the person who conducted our transfers last season.

Stop trying to cause an argument where there isn't one dude......<br /><br />-- Tue Aug 06, 2013 9:23 am --<br /><br />Scott Sinclair to sign for Baggies this week

Scott-Sinclair-2999502.jpg



West Bromwich Albion hope to complete the loan signing of Scott Sinclair later this week.

I understand a proposal for the Baggies to take the 24-year-old on a season-long spell from Manchester City has been given the thumbs up by the Etihad Stadium club.

The remaining issue will be to sort out personal terms, which shouldn’t pose any major issues.

If all goes to plan, the deal could be signed off by the end of the week.

Sinclair, should he join, would fill the void created by the departure of Jerome Thomas.

With Zoltan Gera still out injured - he hasn’t yet re-signed for the club either - the Baggies have few ‘wide’ attacking options.

Albion were yesterday linked with a move for Jermain Defoe, but that is seemingly a non-starter.

The Baggies also looked into the feasibility of entering the battle for Loic Remy’s signature but opted against pursuing him.

The Queens Park Rangers striker is expected to join Newcastle on loan.

As reported in the Birmingham Mail 10 days ago, Albion have had a bid accepted by Lille for Salomon Kalou - the Frenchman is in the process of deciding his future.

http://www.birminghammail.co.uk/spo...ws/west-bromwich-albion-complete-loan-5667036
 
Re: Scott Sinclair. WBA?

citysince88 said:
A loan is a poor decision, would be better to keep him as squad filler.

Why? He's of no use to us whatsoever

Loan ain't the end of the world cos he might actually get a game for an average team. We're obviously not gonna get anything for him after him doing nothing for us last season and clearly being found out to be way, way, way out of his depth. Hopefully he can look half decent in another average team and we might get half our money back if we're lucky
 
Re: Scott Sinclair. WBA?

another 30/40 grand off the wage bill,better than a poke in the eye I suppose.
 
Re: Scott Sinclair. WBA?

The Fat el Hombre said:
citysince88 said:
A loan is a poor decision, would be better to keep him as squad filler.

Why? He's of no use to us whatsoever

Loan ain't the end of the world cos he might actually get a game for an average team. We're obviously not gonna get anything for him after him doing nothing for us last season and clearly being found out to be way, way, way out of his depth. Hopefully he can look half decent in another average team and we might get half our money back if we're lucky

And what if west Brom have a shit season and Sinclair looks dog shit ? if we bring him on against shit teams we're mullering he might contribute something which we can then pass off as talent !
 
Re: Scott Sinclair. WBA?

Hopefully there is a loan fee involved so that when we do sell him, we actually make a profit. Say a £1million loan fee this year then £6million (or more if he has a good season) permanent next summer. Loaning out players for fees isn't a bad idea if they have long contracts as long as the destination club pays his full wages.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.