MCFCTrick
Well-Known Member
Those voting 'Yes' ..... just remember .... the Yanks no you have oil .... and once you aren't part of our 'pact' .... ;-)
Erm, sixteen year olds can marry in England and Wales as well, so what's your point?Gabriel said:ell said:Cant agree with giving 16year olds the vote at all, I know when I was that age me and my mates were definitely not in the position to make such an important decision.
A masterstroke by Salmond
Sorry, but you need to understand that Scotland is a very, very different country. Two sixteen-year olds can legally marry in Scotland, so it makes no sense at all that they cannot vote.
He may be referring to the fact that between the ages of 16-18 in Scotland you don't need parental consent to marry whereas in England and Wales you do.Mëtal Bikër said:Erm, sixteen year olds can marry in England and Wales as well, so what's your point?Gabriel said:ell said:Cant agree with giving 16year olds the vote at all, I know when I was that age me and my mates were definitely not in the position to make such an important decision.
A masterstroke by Salmond
Sorry, but you need to understand that Scotland is a very, very different country. Two sixteen-year olds can legally marry in Scotland, so it makes no sense at all that they cannot vote.
And that's enough of a justification to allow 16 year olds to determine the fate of future generations of an entire nation?Len Rum said:He may be referring to the fact that between the ages of 16-18 in Scotland you don't need parental consent to marry whereas in England and Wales you do.Mëtal Bikër said:Erm, sixteen year olds can marry in England and Wales as well, so what's your point?Gabriel said:Sorry, but you need to understand that Scotland is a very, very different country. Two sixteen-year olds can legally marry in Scotland, so it makes no sense at all that they cannot vote.
Even so, it hardly marks Scotland out as a "very, very different country".Len Rum said:He may be referring to the fact that between the ages of 16-18 in Scotland you don't need parental consent to marry whereas in England and Wales you do.Mëtal Bikër said:Erm, sixteen year olds can marry in England and Wales as well, so what's your point?Gabriel said:Sorry, but you need to understand that Scotland is a very, very different country. Two sixteen-year olds can legally marry in Scotland, so it makes no sense at all that they cannot vote.
It's a good club.smudgedj said:malg said:Jesus Christ.Malty said:Let them go, they will soon come running back.
They need us than we need them.
You'll be able to join the expat club.
Ahh so you can only be a Tory voter to be against the break up of the Union.bellbuzzer said:the anti-Scottish tone of the posters on BM who insist that a yes vote will mean disaster for Scotland and England is puzzling. The mention of the Labour party taking a big hit is greeted with a resounding meh, yet it is the only certain outcome of a yes vote, so unless the tory supporters are acting in a very noble manner and putting self-interest behind a genuine concern for the people of Scotland ( ha ha) , what is their real beef? There isn't a tory party in Scotland ffs. If Scotland is a burden, as is claimed, then getting rid must be a ''good thing'' right. Weakening Labour
must be a good thing, right? What is so fearsome that Cameron ''pleads'' for a no vote, promises to make up for
the years of neglect, extra powers for Scottish Parliament and all manner of bribes. It may be ego-driven or fear of the old tin tack in his case, but that certainly does not apply to the rank and file on BM.
What is the real reason that so provokes tory supporters to such apoplectic rage? And why is it not their battle-cry, instead of meaningless shite like ''Better together''
bellbuzzer said:the anti-Scottish tone of the posters on BM who insist that a yes vote will mean disaster for Scotland and England is puzzling. The mention of the Labour party taking a big hit is greeted with a resounding meh, yet it is the only certain outcome of a yes vote, so unless the tory supporters are acting in a very noble manner and putting self-interest behind a genuine concern for the people of Scotland ( ha ha) , what is their real beef? There isn't a tory party in Scotland ffs. If Scotland is a burden, as is claimed, then getting rid must be a ''good thing'' right. Weakening Labour
must be a good thing, right? What is so fearsome that Cameron ''pleads'' for a no vote, promises to make up for
the years of neglect, extra powers for Scottish Parliament and all manner of bribes. It may be ego-driven or fear of the old tin tack in his case, but that certainly does not apply to the rank and file on BM.
What is the real reason that so provokes tory supporters to such apoplectic rage? And why is it not their battle-cry, instead of meaningless shite like ''Better together''