west didsblue said:
Ifwecouldjust....... said:
Worked well for who though? Not the Scots and thats the problem from their perspective couple of examples
8.9% of the UK population paying 9.9% of the UK tax takeuk government wants to spend £52 billion on a high speed train link whereas there are still a large number of train lines in Scotland running on diesel
A UK Government (Not voted for by Scotland) introduced University fees which Scotland managed to resist for their own population.
UK government wants to renew Trident missile which will cost between £15 and £20 billion. The scots don't even want it and want the subs removing from their country.........
Good luck to the Scots today 'cos whatever way the vote turns out it looks as though they will be independent soon enough
I wonder how much of that tax take comes from people working at places like Faslane supporting the nuclear fleet, the Clyde shipyards that are building ships for the UK navy, servicemen in the UK armed forces based in Scotland etc etc. Following a yes vote, Salmond has already said he's going to cut defence so its unlikely there will be a like for like replacement of servicemen in Scotland, Faslane will shut down and the MoD aren't very likely to give future contracts to foreign shipyards. I'm sure there are many other examples of UK wide industry and services that are based in Scotland that will be relocated to the rest of the UK following a yes vote. Quite a bit of that tax take will also be related to the financial services industry in Edinburgh which is sure to decline following the relocation of the headquarters of some of the largest companies to England.
The tax issue is quite interesting. A lot was made in the 1970s that with North Sea Oil Scotland would be contributing more per
head than the rest of the union and would not be receiving it all back. That is true for most years and assuming the most optimistic
forecasts may be true for the next 40 years. It was pointed out at the time though that in the previous 270 years the reverse had
applied for virtually every year which is probably not surprising given Scotland's low density of population and therefore greater
cost in the provision of services. This also implies that Scotland could be in trouble when the oil runs out if it is not part of the UK.
Financial services are today very important in all parts of the UK but more especially in certain areas.
The bailout of the Scottish banks during the financial crisis would have been hard for Scotland to bear if she had been independent.
A similar situation existed with the London banks and it's rubbish to say that London always subsidies the rest of England.
In times of difficulty small is not beautiful and a large diverse economy is required. As west didsblue has said Scotland has
seen a lot of "UK wide" government spending on things like defence.
The UK government is voted for by Scotland. Scotland is a full member of he UK, joined the UK voluntarily and has MPs at
Westminster. A disproportionate number of senior Cabinet posts during the last 20 years have been taken by Scots.
Saying a Tory government (which we don't actually have) doesn't represent Scotland is only like saying a Labour government
doesn't represent the Home Counties.Scotland has a major say in it's spending on things like education which the English
regions do not.
Scotland doesn't want Trident? Sorry NATO is a nuclear alliance. An alliance that Scotland wants to join.
If Scotland votes YES today then good luck to them but it would be a big mistake that would adversely affect everybody
within the UK.