Blue_Ketchup
Well-Known Member
Kippaxstreetheadache said:ChicagoBlue said:Season tickets expensive at the Etihad???? You have got to be shitting me?!
So, I guess booze, fags and takeaway have been off the menu for the last few decades then, too, eh?
Soooooo tired of hearing this argument EVERY FUCKING YEAR!
There are 36,000 season tickets and the ground is being made bigger just so the people WAITING FOR ONE can get one, yet people are whinging as if they are somehow entitled to one because they have been a fan for a while and don't like the club moving up in the world or attracting to "middle class" fans?!
In case you didn't see it, the City Season Ticket is the BEST VALUE IN THE PREMIER LEAGUE, and the quality of the football you have been treated to the past few seasons has been some of the best, if not THE BEST, I have seen in the 40 odd years I have been going.
Step back and grab some perspective. The best seat in the stadium is about £700. Over 52 weeks, that is less than £15 a week. Cheapest season ticket is £300, or less than £6 a week!!
So, back to my first sentence!
But, if you don't drink, don't smoke and don't eat out, and that's still too much for you, I understand your dilemma and hope you are able to get to a game or two when able.
Absolute pure and unadulterated nonsense.
You have absolutely no right to condemn long standing blues for complaining about year on year prices increases.
You would though, wouldn't you? As you don't pay for tickets or season tickets.
One of the main reasons our individual ticket prices and season ticket prices are increasing year on year is due to an increase in demand from new fans like yourself. Without that increase in demand, from people like yourself, who couldn't haven't given a shit about us when we were managed by Pearce for example, the club wouldn't be able to increase the prices, even with all the success in the world - as people who couldn't afford the increases in cost were priced out of season tickets, and subsequently be forced to attend less regularly, or altogether, those seats wouldn't be filled. The demand wouldn't be there.
It's the new fans, as well as the success, which has allowed the club to increase ticket prices year on year.
For some strange reason we have no right to complain when we're expected to pay more and more each season due to an increase in demand from people who couldn't have given a shit about us a few years back?
Sound logic.
As for your 'points', they're all redundant, and the majority are incorrect.
Our season tickets are not the best value in the league. They're fairly average in terms of cost among the top clubs. In fact, for comparison, for the past two years a season ticket in the lower tier of the Streford End would cost you less than an equivalent Gold seasoncard in the South Stand lower. This is from a club we've traditionally seen as notorious for ripping off its fans.
My season ticket cost £715 this season. That averages £37.60 per game. I don't consider that value, irrespective of the quality of football we now enjoy.
Your maths is entirely incorrect, and I highly doubt you've been a fan of over 40 years if you think a season ticket includes every single game at home. It doesn't. It includes 19 league games, that's it. Hence I pay an average of £37.60 per league game.
Every other game at home is an extra cost to consider.
And since our individual ticket prices are increasing the most, this cost is considerable.
I don't think Value Gold season tickets should be used as much of a defence of the overall club policy of increasing the cost of match tickets. The Value Gold seasoncards represent nothing more than a token gesture IMO, their percentage of the 36,000 total is so small it's an insignificance, but it allows the club to claim at being among the cheapest season tickets in the league. It's tokenism at it's very purest.
Every year we're expected to pay more. Some might justify that and point to the football, and our phenomenal increase in fortunes on the pitch.
However, my response is simple. I didn't demand a successful City, a City paying the best salaries in the sporting world. I would still be attending games regularly if we were managed by Pearce. Managers come and go, players come and go, chairmen come and go, but our support remains constant. That's what has made this club different, that's what made this club so special and attractive to kids like me where the alternative was the soulless corporate glory of United.
That is all changing. As the ticket prices increase year on year, our match going support will change. It already has, and is continuing to do so. It's gentrification. And this sport is the only place where it's accepted and even readily justified.
Even if you're in a privileged enough position to afford every increase in cost, with no repercussions for the amount of games you attended; if the whole demographics of our match going crowd changed, and all the season ticket holders you meet and greet around you on a match day are priced out, and replaced by floating new fans, who have no real affinity with this club, what makes that attractive to a real blue?
We essentially become the like-for-like soulless corporate rip-off which we used to deride United for.
That is not something I ever expected City to become a part of, and it's something I wouldn't want to be a part of, irrespective of success or 'glory'.
I make no apologies for saying this, and I expect a lot of flak for saying it, but shortly after the takeover we were assured that we, the fans, we central to everything ADUG had planned for the club - we weren't going to be forgotten. Khaldoon emphasised this over and over again, the truth is, these words have proven to be hollow.
We have a right to be disheartened and disgruntled by this.
very good post... out of around 10 lads who used to go 90% of aways a few years ago theres maybe 3 or 4 of us who only do locals now. i'm going to have to drop cup schemes next year as simply can't afford another year like the one we have just had...