I'm not Mancini's biggest fan. I still find it all a bit too negative at times. I can appreciate we have to defend staunchly in certain games, but there are teams we should be going for the jugular from the off. We did that at Wolves for the first 20 minutes and then sat back and let Wolves attack us through their best player in Jarvis time and time again, on both flanks.
Are the players to blame for us slacking off after going 1-0 up? I think they are to a certain extent, but the manager has to be partly responsible at least for getting the team to fight a bit more (and not with each other). Our back 4 didn't perform well on Saturday, but again, Wolves knew that playing down the wing was how to attack us, and it paid off for them. Richards and Boateng were turned inside-out as Wolves came at us with two or three against one or two. That's something the manager has to identify and act upon.
It's a bit knee-jerk to call for his head after one game (and I appreciate that people aren't basing their opinions on the Wolves match alone), but at the moment on here people would have us believe that when Kolarov comes back Mancini will play this amazing formation. So we are relying on one player to complete the jigsaw? That's pretty shit really. We've got a squad full of great players yet we can't use them right until we get a left-back fit when we have two others on the books. Doesn't make any sense to me.
I personally don't have a timeframe for when we should consider RM's tenure. We are in a position unlike any other team where wholesale changes have happened season after season. It has to settle at some point. I hope that when it does, w'll be firing on all cylinders and picking up points when we should. But a bad day at the office over the weekend isn't enough for me to start thinking about getting rid. If it happens frequently then that's a different kettle of fish.