A
A
Anonymous
Guest
If this is correct would that potentially mean the rules could not be implemented until a verdict is held?BlueAnorak said:I have it on good authority that Fulham WILL challenge the ruling in the courts.
If this is correct would that potentially mean the rules could not be implemented until a verdict is held?BlueAnorak said:I have it on good authority that Fulham WILL challenge the ruling in the courts.
strongbowholic said:If this is correct would that potentially mean the rules could not be implemented until a verdict is held?BlueAnorak said:I have it on good authority that Fulham WILL challenge the ruling in the courts.
BlueAnorak said:In short - no worries for City whatsoever.
Am I happy that the ladder has been pulled up to prevent other clubs fans living the dream. YES you bet your life I am.
No, it is incidental. UEFA rules require a much lower amount so it means nothing for us.BlueAnorak said:This is actually good for us should we actually fail to qualify for the CL.
Never mind us, what about the dreams of fans of other clubs?Skashion said:No, it is incidental. UEFA rules require a much lower amount so it means nothing for us.BlueAnorak said:This is actually good for us should we actually fail to qualify for the CL.
Look at it from Kenwright's point of view. He'll get up to £40m extra income from the TV deal in 2013/14 and only has to spend £4m of it. Why wouldn't he vote for it?Marvin said:Anti-competitive, but why did the majority of clubs vote for it?
blingy said:BlueAnorak said:In short - no worries for City whatsoever.
Am I happy that the ladder has been pulled up to prevent other clubs fans living the dream. YES you bet your life I am.
This Not a personal dig at you pal,
That’s the kind of comment / opinion id expect from rag cafe,,,,
Not much difference from that to " lets stop everyone else spending so we can win it every year, I’m ok jack fk you "!
Surprised blues have that opinion, maybe my age...
Each to their own i guess..