Jim Tolmie's Underpants said:I'm very disappointed in Mancini's tactics.
After the first game he should have learned that you cannot sit back all the time against them - particularly with our defence.
Not good enough Mancini!
To be honest mate apart from Wolves and Blackburn we look average .johnny crossan said:Jim Tolmie's Underpants said:I'm very disappointed in Mancini's tactics.
After the first game he should have learned that you cannot sit back all the time against them - particularly with our defence.
Not good enough Mancini!
So it's Mancini out is it? Not good enough for you. What or who would you suggest would be good enough?
Colins Bellend said:To be honest mate apart from Wolves and Blackburn we look average .johnny crossan said:So it's Mancini out is it? Not good enough for you. What or who would you suggest would be good enough?
One thing i do know is that Hughes would not have had Garrido in there because he is shit and wasn't even third choice under Hughes.For me Mancini has got a lot of work to do in defence ,last night as in the first leg we were took the piss out of on both flanks,thats a management decision
Rammy Blue said:Colins Bellend said:To be honest mate apart from Wolves and Blackburn we look average .
One thing i do know is that Hughes would not have had Garrido in there because he is shit and wasn't even third choice under Hughes.For me Mancini has got a lot of work to do in defence ,last night as in the first leg we were took the piss out of on both flanks,thats a management decision
So who would you have played at left back?
Rammy Blue said:Colins Bellend said:To be honest mate apart from Wolves and Blackburn we look average .
One thing i do know is that Hughes would not have had Garrido in there because he is shit and wasn't even third choice under Hughes.For me Mancini has got a lot of work to do in defence ,last night as in the first leg we were took the piss out of on both flanks,thats a management decision
So who would you have played at left back?