Gina Vale on Begum:
She was groomed as a child and has endured trauma – and to say she now ‘looks western’ is an insult to British Muslims, says radicalisation expert Gina Vale
www.theguardian.com
The publications of the International Centre for the Study of Radicalization at King's College, London are usually well-informed. The contributory scholars are also not necessarily left-wing. For example, Shiraz Maher (who was critical of Corbyn on his Twitter feed a while ago) has pretty much authored the definitive work on Salafi-Jihadism. Here's an older piece of his on Begum:
There is a moral case for repatriating minors taken to Syria by their parents or born there to British migrants.
www.newstatesman.com
The journalist Patrick Cockburn was also very good in his reportage on what went on in ISIS controlled territory. Here's a sample:
The instrument shows increasing levels of barbarity within the 'caliphate's' own walls.
www.businessinsider.com
From memory, my understanding is that the punishment described here ('the biter') was often administered by women. Of course, we know very little about what Begum and other women actually got up to during their time when ISIS was more in the ascendant, but this is also something to take into consideratiion.
I actually don't know Vale, nor am I well-informed enough at present to pass judgement on the Begum case and the wider issue of 'jihadi brides'. But from many years of teaching ethics, what I do know that is that our moral judgements are often instantaneous, and that we then tend to formulate
post hoc justifications for them. So this is something that has to be factored in and that we need to be wary of, especially given that we don't tend to be swayed even when presented with information that flatly contradicts the position we have adopted or that shows it to be demonstrably false.
For more on this, see Jonathan Haidt's
The Righteous Mind and Joshua Greene's
Moral Tribes.
Lastly, on the wider issue of moral agency, I would encourage readers of this thread to look at the case of Leopold and Loeb and particularly the arguments deployed by their attorney Clarence Darrow in the hope of sparing this notorious pair the death penalty, as well as what happened to them in later life.
Dave Eagleman's book
Incognito (on the manner in which the unconscious brain influences our behaviour without our necessarily realizing as well as the relationship between neuroscience and the law) is also possibly relevant. Although he doesn't discuss the adolescent brain specifically, I would be interested to know more about how the brain of a 15 year old is configured in comparison to that of a fully-fledged adult, and whether this might impact in any way on impulse control and conscious decision-making.